Search Results for "Juvenile Justice Board"

202 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 202 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and IPC Rape Case Due to Unproven Minority Status and Negative DNA Evidence - Benefit of Doubt Granted

The appellant was convicted by the Trial Court for offences under IPC and POCSO Act for allegedly having forcible sexual intercourse with a minor vict...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Transfer of Juvenile to Adult Court in POCSO Case. Preliminary assessment under Section 15 of JJ Act, 2015 upheld as valid and unbiased.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Mustafa Khan Jabbar Khan, a juvenile in conflict with law, challenging the judgment and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction in Murder and Ransom Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Together Theory. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 364-A, 384 IPC confirmed as chain of circumstances complete and consistent with guilt.

The appellant, Kushal @ Akash Dattatray Prabhu, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Nashik for the murder of Mohitesh Pralin Baviskar and for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Bail to Juvenile Accused in POCSO Case — Emphasizes Liberal Approach Under Juvenile Justice Act. The court held that the JJ Board and Sessions Court erred in rejecting bail without considering the petitioner's juvenility and the beneficial provisions of the JJ Act.

The petitioner, a minor represented by his father, filed a criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C. challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Age Determination in Murder Case. Court Upholds Sessions Judge's Finding That Appellant Was Above 18 Years Based on Birth Certificate Over School Certificate Under Rule 12 of Juvenile Justice Rules, 2007.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging the Punjab & Haryana High Court's order dismissing as withdrawn the appellant's applications for addit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Juvenile Plea in Rape Case — Ossification Test Indicates Age Above 18 Years. Margin of Error Not Applied as Test Conducted Near Incident Date and School Records Not Produced.

The petitioner, Shaikh Azhar @ Shahrukh s/o Shaikh Shikur, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the rejection of hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Juvenile Benefit Claim After Final Conviction Under Section 7A of Juvenile Justice Act, 2000. Claim of Juvenility Can Be Raised at Any Stage Even After Final Disposal; Court Must Determine Age and Forward Juvenile to Board.

The petitioner, Sunil s/o Laxman Javade, was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code by judgment and order dated 08....