Search Results for "Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946"

184 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 184 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Municipal Corporation Challenging Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practice. Withdrawal of incentive bonus without lawful revision held to be unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai through its General Manager of BEST, challenged the judgment and order dated 14 February 2008 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC030058022017_1

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by workmen of the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contract Workmen's Wage Parity Claim Against Principal Employer. Existence of Agreement with Representative Union Precludes Non-Members from Claiming Higher Wages Under Contract Labour Act.

The petition was filed by Mumbai Electric Employees Union, a non-representative union of contract workmen, challenging the order of the Additional Lab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Order Granting Permanency to Fixed-Term Security Guard in Saudi Arabian Airlines Case. Fixed-term employment found to be a camouflage to deny permanency benefits under MRTU & PULP Act.

The appellant, Saudi Arabian Airlines, engaged the respondent workman as a Security Guard on a fixed-term contract from 1st October 1989 for two years...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court's Order and Allows Written Statement in Appeal Under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946. Industrial Court Must Permit Filing of Written Statement and Lead Evidence as Rule 13 of Bombay Rules Does Not Prohibit Pleadings in Appeal.

The writ petition arose from an appeal under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, pending before the Industrial Court. The managemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Anganwadi Sevika with Full Back Wages in Termination Dispute. Industrial Court's Revision Order Restoring Continuity and Back Wages Upheld as Termination Found Unjustified Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioners, the Zilla Parishad and the Child Development Project Officer, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court dated 17/09/2013 in Rev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Air India, Upholds Dismissal of Air Hostess for Unauthorized Absence After Maternity Leave. The court held that the Industrial Tribunal's order of reinstatement was perverse and that the employer's decision to dismiss was justified under the Model Standing Orders.

The litigation between Air India Limited (appellant) and Ms. Shashikala Jatav (respondent) has been ongoing for two decades. The respondent was employ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Petition Challenging Repatriation Order in MRTU & PULP Act Complaint. Transfer from EDP Section to Generation Side Held Not an Unfair Labour Practice as Employee Had No Right to Continue in Particular Post.

The petitioner, Promod Singh Hanuman Singh Parihar, was employed as a Sub-Engineer/Chargeman Grade II in the Generation side of the Maharashtra State ...