Search Results for "Illegal Gratification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Illegal Gratification"

324 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 324 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

20 Mar 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 04.08...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Complainant's Failure to Support Prosecution Case and Lack of Independent Witnesses Lead to Confirmation of Acquittal Under Sections 7, 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

20 Mar 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

12 Mar 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Hostile Witnesses and Lack of Proof of Demand. Allegation of Bribe Demand by Government Labour Officer Fails as Prosecution Fails to Prove Demand and Acceptance Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

10 Feb 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Sanction. Decoy Trap Found Vitiated as Panch Witnesses Were Police Employees and Sanction for Prosecution Was Not Obtained Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

5 Feb 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Forest Officer in Bribery Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Proven by Credible Testimony and Recovery. The court held that the prosecution successfully proved the demand and acceptance of illegal gratification, and the appellant's defence of planting was not credible.

1 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant, a Forest Section Officer, challenging his conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Revenue Inspector in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was declared hostile and prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

12 Feb 2021

The appellant, B. Bhogananjappa, a Revenue Inspector, was convicted by the Special Court and III Additional District & Sessions Judge, Mysuru in Speci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constables in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

18 Jan 2016

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of two police constables, Ghalappa Sardar Nadgeri (Appellant No.1) and Gurunath Keshav Rathod (A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constables in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness's testimony insufficient to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

18 Jan 2016

The case pertains to two police constables, Ghalappa Sardar Nadgeri (accused no.1) and Gurunath Keshav Rathod (accused no.2), who were convicted by th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Policemen and Private Citizen in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) and Section 12 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was interested and testimony uncorroborated.

27 Oct 2015

The case involves two appeals against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants in Criminal Appeal No.248/02 were police...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)