Search Results for "IPC 397"

496 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 496 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheating and Forgery Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 417, 419, 420, 468 read with 471 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the petitioners (accused No.1 and 2) against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 24....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC set aside as sole eyewitness did not testify that the bus was driven rashly or negligently.

The applicant, Shivaji Damodar Karne, a bus driver employed with BEST, was convicted by the trial court (28th Esplanade Court, Mumbai) in CC No.40/P/9...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows CBI Revision Against Dropping of Section 409 IPC Charge Against Former Minister in Mining Scam Case. Court holds that Section 216 CrPC cannot be used to drop charges after framing, and that the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction by reviewing its own order.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed three criminal revision petitions challenging orders passed by the LXXXI Additional City Civil and Ses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 397 IPC set aside as sole witness identification was doubtful and no recovery of weapon or stolen property was made.

The appellants, Balu @ Meghanand Punamchand Meshram and Sandeep Digambar Wasnik, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati, for the of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in MCOCA Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Ransom. Conviction under Section 364A IPC and MCOCA set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the victim was kidnapped for ransom.

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Special Judge under MCOC Case No. 15 of 2005 for offences under Section 364A, 365,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder, Robbery, and House Trespass in Doctor's Killing — Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Stolen Articles Sufficient to Prove Guilt.

The appellant, Sunil Nirmal Bisth, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.1267 of 1996 for offe...