Search Results for "IPC 344"

91 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 91 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Murder and Conspiracy Case Due to Non-Compliance with Investigation Duties and Lack of Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 302, 201 IPC and Section 25(1)(1b)(a) Arms Act Set Aside as Investigation Flawed and Conspiracy Charge Not Addressed While Co-Accused Acquitted.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by an appellant convicted for murder, destruction of evidence, and arms offenses, while other co-accused were a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Sister-in-Law in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Applicant, being sister-in-law residing separately, was not part of the matrimonial home and no specific overt acts were attributed to her in the FIR.

The applicant, Sonia Jaiswal, sister-in-law of the informant Sapna Jaiswal, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail to Accused in MPID Act Case Due to Chargesheet Not Taken Cognizance Within 90 Days. The right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC accrues when the chargesheet is not taken cognizance within the prescribed period, even if physically filed earlier.

The applicant, Wasudeo Shrawan Kamble, was arrested on 13 July 2020 in connection with Crime No. 427/2020 registered at Police Station Ballarshah, Dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 447, 504, 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Vijay @ Vijendra, was convicted by the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi, for offences under Sections 447, 504 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petitions Challenging Judicial Custody Beyond 15 Days Under Section 309(2) Cr.P.C. — Remand Orders Not Vitiated as Petitioners Failed to Show Prejudice or Illegality.

The petitioners, Harshad Dinanath Bari and Ravindra Vasudev Bari & Ors., were accused in Boisar police station C.R. No. I-267/2017 (MPID Case No. 2 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Resolves Conflict on Applicability of Section 167(2)(a)(i) vs (ii) CrPC for Default Bail in Offences Punishable with Life Imprisonment. The court held that life imprisonment is a term of not less than ten years, thus the 90-day period under clause (ii) applies.

The case arose from a reference made by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court while hearing a bail application filed by two accused persons,...