Search Results for "IPC 166"

288 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 288 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction Under Arms Act and IPC in 1993 Bombay Serial Blasts Case. Appellants Challenged Conviction for Possession of Prohibited Arms Without License and Destruction of Evidence.

The Supreme Court heard appeals against the conviction and sentence of Sanjay Dutt (A-117), Yusuf Mohsin Nulwalla (A-118), and Kersi Bapuji Adajania (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Advocate Petitioner in Land Fraud Case Under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 166 read with Section 34 Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Legal Advice Not Constituting Offence

The petitioner, an advocate, filed a criminal writ petition challenging orders impleading him as an accused in a land fraud case under IPC sections --...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Assault Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Civil Nature of Dispute. FIR under Sections 323, 324, 341, 427, 504, 506 IPC quashed as allegations were vague and the dispute was civil.

The petitioners, C. Ganesh Narayan and Vidya Nataraj, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Murder Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC. Appeal Challenges Trial Court Finding That Accused Persons Beheaded Victim and Destroyed Evidence Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Common Intention.

The appeal arose from the judgment and conviction dated 23.10.2019 and order of sentence dated 28.10.2019 passed by the IX Additional District and Ses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Appeals Against Conviction Under Section 302 and 380 IPC. Appellants’ Conviction and Life Imprisonment Upheld Based on Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Together and Recovery of Stolen Ornaments.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by accused Nos. 1 and 2 against their conviction and sentence for the murder of the informant’s wife an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Rash Driving Causing Death — Evidence of Eye-Witnesses and Spot Panchnama Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 279, 337, 338, 304A IPC.

The applicant, Harish Narayan Burkule, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Khamgaon for offences punishable under Sections 279, 337,...