Search Results for "Evidence Gaps"

249 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 249 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Chain. Conviction under Sections 302, 326, 394, 201, 120(B) IPC and Section 135 Gujarat Police Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Parulben Mahendrabhai Godani, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Surat in Sessions Case No. 150/2016 for the murde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal Against High Court Order Permitting Recall of Prosecutrix for Cross-Examination in Rape Case. Section 311 CrPC Recall Allowed Only if Testimony is Essential for Just Decision and Not to Fill Gaps in Defence.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the High Court of Tripura which set aside the Trial Court's order rejecting an application under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(d)(i)(n), 377, 323 IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Christian Rajendran, Joy Rajendran, and Salomi Rajendran against their conviction and sentence under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence and Unreliable Confession. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on confession and circumstantial evidence.

The Supreme Court of India heard criminal appeals filed by four appellants challenging their conviction for murder under Section 302 read with Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistencies. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Smt. Kavitha, was convicted by the IV-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madhugiri, in S.C.No.5051/2016 for the offence punishable...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Director's Evidence in Specific Performance Suit — Order 18 Rule 3A CPC Does Not Apply to Company Director. Director of Plaintiff-Company Can Be Examined After Constituted Attorney Without Prior Permission Under Order 18 Rule 3A CPC.

The petitioners, defendants in a suit for specific performance of a contract based on email exchanges, challenged the trial court's order allowing the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 363, 364, and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dhananjay Janardhan Yadav, was convicted by the V Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for the kidnapping and murder of his five-y...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive of Illicit Relationship. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for killing deceased due to illicit relationship with his wife; conviction based on motive, last seen evidence, and recovery of weapon.

The appellant, Surendra Sribali Sahu, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Pramod Amrit Ram. The prosecution case was that the appell...