Search Results for "Electricity Connection"

730 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 730 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Electricity Board's Appeal in Monthly Minimum Charges Dispute — Remands to Civil Court for Factual Adjudication. Disputed facts regarding readiness to avail HT supply require trial, not writ jurisdiction under Article 226.

The case involves two writ appeals filed by the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board against a common order dated 25.07.2022 in W.P.Nos.36209 of 2007 and 2355...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against MSEDCL for Refund of Infrastructure Costs Under DDF Category. Consumer Definition Under Electricity Act, 2003 Includes Persons Supplied Electricity for Layout Development.

The petitioner, Smt. Savita Chandrashekhar Thodage, applied to the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) for a new electric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Generating Company and State Utility in Electricity Tariff Dispute. Deemed Generation Incentive Not Payable After 1995 Notification; Supplementary Agreement Bars Retrospective Interest on Deemed Loan.

The Supreme Court dismissed two appeals arising from a common order of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) concerning a power purchase agre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Electricity Board's Appeals in Illegal Disconnection Case — Board Cannot Claim Charges for Period of Its Own Wrongful Act. Initial Disconnection Without Considering Consumer's Instalment Request Violates Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003.

The appeals arose from a dispute between the Bihar State Electricity Board (appellant) and M/s Iceberg Industries Ltd. (respondent/company) concerning...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order in Electricity Line Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction. Order under Section 16 of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 set aside as no hearing was given to landowners before granting permission for drawing electricity lines.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Mr. Manohar Shetty and Mr. Sunil Kumar Shetty against the Deputy Commissioner and District Magistrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Application to Declare Arbitral Award Satisfied as Vexatious and Dilatory. Unilateral Deposit of Disputed Amount Without Decree-Holder's Consent Does Not Discharge Judgment-Debtor Under Section 31 CPC.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the unsuccessful respondent in an ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Injunction Against Electricity Company from Supplying Power to Other Consumers via Dedicated Distribution Facility. Petitioner's Exclusive Right Over DDF Infrastructure Not Established Under Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, Mr. Budreddin A. Khan, a plastic processing factory owner, applied for an electricity connection under the Dedicated Distribution Faci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Accused in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Procedural Irregularities. Conviction under Sections 135 and 138 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside as prosecution failed to prove tampering beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Anandrao Madhavrao Shinde, was convicted by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Special Case No.126 of 2006 for offe...