Search Results for "Dilatory tactics"

96 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 96 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Arbitration Clause Does Not Oust Jurisdiction of DRT Under Section 19 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

The petitioner, Harvestdeal Securities Ltd., challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 19 February 2015, which set asid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under RDDB Act, 1993, and Arbitration Clause Cannot Oust It.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Harvestdeal Securities Ltd. challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Refusal to Condone Delay in Appeal Against Termination. Petitioner's failure to pursue remedies diligently and absence of sufficient cause for delay of over three years led to dismissal.

The petitioner, Popat Sitaram Godge, was terminated from service on 22.05.1994 by the respondent educational institution. He initially filed a civil s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Refusal to Condone Delay in Appeal Against Termination. Petitioner's Multiple Forums and Unexplained Delay of Over Three Years Justified Rejection of Condonation Application.

The petitioner, Popat Sitaram Godge, was terminated from service on 22.05.1994 by the respondent educational institution. Instead of filing an appeal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Zilla Parishad's Writ Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Orders After 8-Year Delay. Delay of 8 years and 1 month in challenging Industrial Court's judgment not satisfactorily explained; petitions dismissed on ground of laches and delay.

The petitioner, the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad Jalna, filed two writ petitions challenging the common judgment dated 19/12/2006 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Territorial Jurisdiction and Interim Relief. Held that DRT Ahmedabad had jurisdiction to entertain the bank's recovery application and that the Appellate Tribunal's refusal to grant interim relief was justified.

The petitioner, M/s. GTCL Mobile-Com Technology Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, challenged two orders: (1) an order dated 14-11...