Search Results for "Debts Deduction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Debts Deduction"

123 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 123 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition as Time-Barred Under Limitation Act — Acknowledgment Letters Do Not Extend Limitation Beyond Three Years. The court held that a winding-up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 must be filed within three years from the last acknowledgment of debt; otherwise, it is barred by limitation.

2 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Uma Kumar, proprietor of Kandhan Electricals & Engineers, filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment for Return of Shares and Dividends in Commercial Suit — Plaintiff Stockbroker Entitled to 11,25,000 ITC Shares and Accrued Dividends After Full Satisfaction of Debt Under One Time Settlement. Court Holds That Once Debt Is Fully Satisfied, Bank Must Return All Pledged Securities and Cannot Retain Them as Collateral for Other Debts.

10 Mar 2025

The Plaintiff, Shrikant G. Mantri, a stockbroker and registered member of the Bombay Stock Exchange, filed a commercial suit against Punjab National B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Orders Against Former Directors in GST Case — Personal Liability Cannot Be Imposed Without Shedding Corporate Veil. Directors Who Resigned Prior to Tax Period Cannot Be Held Liable for Company's Tax Dues Under MGST Act, BST Act, and CST Act Without Lifting Corporate Veil.

22 Aug 2022

The petitioners, Mukesh D. Ramani, Satish D. Sanghavi, and Prakash D. Sanghavi, were former directors of Twin City Organics Pvt. Ltd. They filed writ ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 for Debt Disputed in Good Faith. Petition Filed to Exert Pressure for Unreasonable Demands, Not for Recovery of Genuine Debt.

7 Jun 2006

The petitioner, Fomento Resorts And Hotels Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 against the respondent, G...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Official Liquidator to Keep Provision for EPF Claims in Winding Up of Navinon Limited. Court Directs Refund of Excess Payment to EPF Office Kandivali.

15 Mar 2017

This judgment arises from Official Liquidator's Report No.517 of 2015 in Company Petition No.1176 of 2001, concerning M/s.Navinon Limited (In Liquidat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Bank to Refer MSME Loan Account for Restructuring Under RBI Framework - Petitioner's MSME Status Entitles It to Benefit of Framework for Revival and Rehabilitation. The court held that the bank was obligated to refer the stressed MSME account to the Committee for restructuring as per the Government Notification dated 29.05.2015 and RBI Master Direction dated 21.07.2016, following the Supreme Court's decision in Pro Knits.

29 Jan 2026

The petitioners, Vardhan Agro Processing Limited (petitioner No.1, an MSME) and its chairman and shareholder (petitioner No.2), filed a writ petition ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Reasonable Belief and Change of Opinion. Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Allegation of Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

7 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Nivi Trading Limited, a private limited company, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2010-11 on 15th September 2010 declari...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Prior Recording of Reasons. Reopening under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid as Reasons Not Recorded Before Issuance of Notice.

20 Feb 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Indusind Media & Communications Ltd., filed its return of income for assessment year 2007-08, which was revised and subsequently ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considers batch of income tax appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging ITAT orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05. Assessee and Revenue both seek to set aside the ITAT decisions and frame substantial questions of law.

25 Mar 2015

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with a batch of income tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals a...

Tribunals

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Appeal by Suspended Director in Insolvency Case — Section 9 Application Admitted Without Proper Notice Under Section 8 of IBC. The Adjudicating Authority Failed to Consider That the Operational Creditor Had Not Provided Correct Address for Service of Demand Notice, Rendering the Admission Order Unsustainable.

19 Jan 2024

The appeal was filed by Sashi Kanta Jha, a suspended director of the corporate debtor, M/s Juggilal Kamlapat Jute Mills Company Limited (now Geo Jute ...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)