Search Results for "Debt Recovery Tribunal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...

Search Results for "Debt Recovery Tribunal"

643 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 643 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Case: CIRP Not a Substitute for Execution of Civil Court Decree. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 — Section 7 — Financial Debt — Decree Holder Cannot Bypass Execution Process.

23 Apr 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Appellants against the order of the NCLAT which had directed admission of a Section 7 petition under the...

Tribunals

NCLAT Allows Section 7 Petition in Insolvency Case Due to Acknowledgment of Debt in Balance Sheets and Emails. Repeated acknowledgment of debt by Corporate Debtor in balance sheets and emails extends limitation period under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963, saving the petition from being time-barred.

3 Jul 2025

The case involves an appeal filed by Akzo Nobel India Ltd. (Financial Creditor) against Stan Cars Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) under Section 61 of the...

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal of Operational Creditor in IBC Section 9 Case — Pre-Existing Dispute Regarding Quality of Services Bars CIRP Initiation. The dispute regarding quality of transportation services raised by the Corporate Debtor prior to the demand notice constitutes a pre-existing dispute under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the Adjudicating Authority correctly dismissed the application.

4 Sep 2024

The appeal was filed by Union Roadways Limited (Operational Creditor) against Ice Steel 1 Private Limited (Corporate Debtor) under Section 61 of the I...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditor's Appeal in Customs Duty Priority Dispute Over Wound-Up Company's Hypothecated Goods. Held that customs authorities do not have priority over secured creditors under Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 for sale of warehoused goods under Customs Act, 1962.

1 Sep 2023

The appeal by Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) challenged the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court which held that customs authorities...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Suspended Director Against Admission of Insolvency Petition by Canara Bank Under Section 7 of IBC. Held that a suspended director has no locus standi to challenge the admission of a Section 7 application as the corporate debtor is the proper party.

11 May 2023

The case involves an appeal by M. Suresh Kumar Reddy, claiming to be a suspended director of M/s Kranthi Edifice Pvt. Ltd. (corporate debtor), against...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Operational Creditor's Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Limitation and Pre-existing Dispute. Application Under Section 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Barred as Cause of Action Accrued in 2011-2012 and Dispute Over Gas Supply Existed, Excluding Suspension Period Under Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Not Applicable.

4 Jan 2023

The appeal arose from the dismissal of an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by the National Company Law Tribunal...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Auction Forfeiture Case — Earnest Money Deposit Forfeiture Upheld as Compensation for Breach of Contract. The Court held that forfeiture of earnest money deposit by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act is not subject to proof of actual loss and is governed by the terms of the auction contract, not Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

10 Aug 2022

The case involves two appeals by a nationalized bank (appellant) against a common judgment of the Madras High Court, which had allowed the writ petiti...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Not Barred Under Section 34 When Challenge is to Mortgage Validity and Bank's Actions, Not Recovery Proceedings. The court held that the bar under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act does not apply to a suit seeking declaration of title and challenging the validity of a mortgage, as such issues are not within the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

16 Jul 2021

The appellant, Smt. Nanjamma, filed a civil suit (O.S.No.3780/2017) before the XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, seeking a dec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.

28 Jul 2016

The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Petition for Commission on Guarantees Issued to Court — Canara Bank Entitled to 3% Commission on Guarantees in Favour of Prothonotary and Senior Master. The court held that a bank issuing guarantees at the request of a customer is entitled to commission as per its standard terms, and the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal erred in denying such commission.

6 May 2014

The petitioner, Canara Bank, a body corporate constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, filed a wr...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)