Search Results for "Customs Duty Exemption"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Customs Duty Exemption"

201 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 201 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Imported Textile Machinery — Holds That Show Cause Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Under Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 Is Time-Barred. The court quashed the show cause notice as the department failed to establish any fraud or suppression to justify the extended period of limitation.

20 Feb 2026

The petitioners, Karl Mayer STOLL Textilmaschinenfabrik GmbH and M/s. Karl Mayer India Private Limited, imported textile machinery and cleared the goo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Case — CESTAT's Finding of Baseless Charges Upheld. Penalty Dropped as Evidence Lacked Direct Link to Respondent Under Customs Act, 1962.

15 Dec 2022

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Customs under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the orders of the Customs, Excise and Service T...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Excise Duty Exemption Case — NCCD, Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Not Payable When Basic Excise Duty Exempted. Exemption Notification Under Section 5A of Central Excise Act, 1944 Covers NCCD as Duty of Excise, and Surcharges on Excise Duty Cannot Be Levied Without Substratum.

1 Mar 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute between Bajaj Auto Limited (appellant) and the Union of India (respondent) regarding the liability to pay National Cal...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Trader's Liability for Excise Duty on Job Work Fabrics Under Rule 12B of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Court Held That the Trader Who Gets Fabrics Manufactured Through Job Workers Is Deemed Manufacturer and Liable for Duty, Not the Job Worker.

28 Feb 2019

The case involves appeals by Dinesh Textiles, a trader who got cotton fabrics and made-ups manufactured through job workers, against the order of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Entertainment Tax Demand Against Charity Show Organizer. Show for Blind Held Exempt Under Section 7 of Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923; Recovery Barred by Limitation.

22 Dec 2016

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a common order/action by the State of Maharashtra to recover entertainment duty from the organize...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Settlement Commission's Majority Decision Rejecting Settlement Application in Customs Duty Evasion Case. Majority view prevails over minority view under Section 127I of the Customs Act, 1962 when there is a difference of opinion among Members.

16 Sep 2016

The petitioners, Under Water Services Company Limited and others, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Condition in Customs Circular Requiring Bank Guarantee for Accredited Importers. Condition Requiring Bank Guarantee for Differential Duty in Provisional Assessment Held Valid as Reasonable Safeguard Under Customs Act, 1962.

8 Nov 2011

The petitioner, Shah Pulp & Paper Mills Limited, challenged the legality and validity of a condition contained in paragraph 7(iii) of a circular issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Licensing Authorities for Erroneous Licence Leading to 20 Years of Litigation. Petitioner Firm Penalised for Lapses of Licensing Authorities; Court Grants Relief Based on Fair Admission by Respondents.

7 Apr 2006

The petitioner, M/s. General Instruments Co., a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, filed a writ petition in the Bomba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Customs Mis-declaration Case — Extended Limitation Period Not Invocable Without Proof of Fraud or Collusion. Importer's Mis-declaration for Claiming Notification Benefit Does Not Automatically Attract Penalty Under Section 114A of Customs Act, 1962.

22 Sep 2005

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Revenue) against the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Notices Against Directors in Central Excise Case — No Personal Liability Without Specific Statutory Provision. Directors of a company cannot be treated as assessees or deemed to be in default for excise duty demands under the Central Excise Act, 1944, in the absence of a provision akin to Section 179 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

17 Aug 2005

The petitioners, Sunil Parmeshwar Mittal and Kirti Trambaklal Shah, were directors of a company that was assessed for excise duty. The Deputy Commissi...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)