Search Results for "Corruption allegations"

1034 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1034 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Police Officers in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Syed Imam and Durgadas Kaushalye, a Police Sub Inspector and Police Head Constable, respect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act for Alleged Bribery. Accused Program Executive Convicted Under Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) for Demanding and Accepting Bribe of Rs.20,000.

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka arose from the conviction of the appellant, a former Program Executive at Doordarshan Kendra, Bangalore,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Conviction of Accused in Prevention of Corruption Act Case. Appellant, a surveyor, challenged conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Act, contending that sanction order was invalid and amount received was legal fees.

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka arose from the judgment of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in Special Case No.67/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision and Quash Petitions in Corruption Case Against RTO Officials. Prima Facie Case Exists Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Based on Trap and Recovery of Bribe.

The judgment pertains to two connected petitions arising from Special Case No.35/2015 pending before the Principal District and Sessions Judge and Spe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Sub-Registrar in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Mohan Bhaiyyalal Shrivastava, was a Sub-Registrar at Barshitakli, Akola. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Akola in Special Case N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Against Retired Government Officer in Irrigation Scam Due to Lack of Sanction for Prosecution. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is mandatory and refusal by competent authority bars prosecution.

The petitioner, Chandan Tulsiram Jibhakate, a retired Senior Divisional Account Officer, was implicated in five FIRs (Crime Nos. 540/2017, 542/2017, 6...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Vitiated Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 found to be without application of mind, and prosecution evidence on demand and acceptance of bribe was mutually inconsistent.

The appellant, Ravindra s/o Marotrao Thakre, was convicted by the Special Court under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Against Public Servant Under Prevention of Corruption Act Due to Defective Source Report. Source Information Report Prepared in Hot Haste Without Calculating Disproportionate Assets, Violates Fundamental Rights.

The petitioner, a public servant working as an Executive Engineer in Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited, was accused of amassing assets ...