Search Results for "Constituent Default"

85 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 85 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Section 326 IPC Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction for voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapon set aside as prosecution failed to prove intention or knowledge beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Junaid B, was convicted by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, D.K., Mangaluru in S.C. No. 2/2012 for an offence under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Abetment to Suicide. Conviction under Sections 498A and 306 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove cruelty or instigation leading to suicide.

The case involves an appeal by three accused persons (mother-in-law, sister-in-law, and father-in-law) against their conviction under Sections 498A an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Deputy Commissioner of Excise in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside due to unreliable trap witnesses and lack of corroboration.

The appellant, Shivananda Bankolli, was the Deputy Commissioner of Excise at Mysore. He was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge & Special Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broking Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Contrary to Public Policy or Suffering from Patent Illegality.

The petitioner, Bombay Construction and Engineering Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit for Recovery Due to Prior Arbitration Awards. The court held that the suit is barred by res judicata as the same claims were already adjudicated in arbitration proceedings under the Arbitration Act, 1940.

The plaintiff, Unique Integrated Transport & Management Consultancies Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL) and its of...