Search Results for "Conflicting decrees"

140 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 140 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Trial Court Decree for Declaration, Possession, and Mesne Profits. Vendor-Purchaser Dispute: Non-delivery of possession after sale deed execution leads to decree for possession and mesne profits.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed by defendant Nos.1 and 2 (Kullappa and Muniyellappa) against the judgment and decree dated 11.04.2003 i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Two Regular First Appeals Filed Against Trial Court Judgments in Property Dispute. Appeals Challenge Dismissal of Declaration Suit and Decree of Partition Suit Based on Conflicting Gift Deeds and Succession Claims.

The High Court of Karnataka took up two Regular First Appeals (RFA No.1285/2008 and RFA No.731/2014) for common disposal, arising from two original ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC030005792015_1

The judgment relates to a conglomeration of appeals and cross-objections arising out of land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Karnata...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Trial and Appellate Courts. Agreement to Sell Does Not Confer Ownership; Plaintiff Failed to Prove Payment of Consideration and Possession.

The appellant, original plaintiff, filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award rejecting claim for specific performance of oral agreement to transfer shares, finding no valid contract and no limitation bar.

The petitioner, Vijay Shivram Pathare, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an arbitral award dated 30 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Partition Appeal in Co-owner Dispute — Rejects Adverse Possession Claim. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner without ouster, and a suit for partition is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a family dispute over property originally owned by M.A. Mohammed Ayoob. The appellant, Mohammed Hussain, filed a suit for partition ...