Search Results for "CESTAT order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "CESTAT order"

315 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 315 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Tax Appeal in Customs Duty Dispute Over Installation of High Performance Liquid Chromatograph Machine in Laboratory Attached to Factory. The court considered whether the Tribunal was justified in confirming the demand of duty despite regularisation by DGFT and amendment of notification widening the scope of 'factory'.

11 Mar 2026

The case involves a Tax Appeal filed by Atlas Dye Chem Industries against the Union of India and others, arising from a dispute over customs duty exem...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Allows Tax Appeal in Customs Duty Dispute — Installation of High Performance Liquid Chromatograph in Laboratory Attached to Factory Does Not Breach Condition No.6 of Notification No.110/95-Cus. Amendment by Notification No.42/98-Cus Widens Scope of 'Factory' and DGFT Regularisation Valid.

11 Mar 2026

The case involves a tax appeal by Atlas Dye Chem Industries against the Union of India and others, arising from a dispute over the import of High Perf...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case Due to Abatement Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Settlement Under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 Renders Proceedings Infructuous and Extinguishes Liability.

30 Sep 2024

The appellant, M/s Patanjali Foods Limited (formerly Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd), filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Classification Dispute. CESTAT's finding that activity was classifiable under Works Contract Service rather than Erection Commissioning and Installation Service upheld.

14 Dec 2022

The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Thane, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Finance Act, 1994 agains...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Agricultural Produce Market Committees in Service Tax Case on Exemption Grounds. The court upheld service tax liability for renting immovable property pre-01.07.2012, ruling that the activity was not a statutory duty under the Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 and exemption under Circular No.89/7/2006 does not apply.

23 Feb 2022

The Supreme Court of India, in a judgment delivered by Justice M.R. Shah, addressed a group of appeals filed by various Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti (Agri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Central Excise Classification Disputes — Cenvat Credit and Valuation Issues Decided. Classification of goods under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and eligibility for Cenvat Credit under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 determined based on functional use and technical literature.

30 Jul 2014

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against orders o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Order Setting Aside Confiscation and Penalties in Currency Seizure Case. Confiscation of USD 3,50,000 for Prior Visits Set Aside as Department Failed to Prove Illegal Export; Penalties Under Section 114 of Customs Act, 1962 Require Active Participation.

7 Jul 2014

The Commissioner of Customs (C.S.I. Airport), Mumbai, filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the order dated 6 March ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — Strict Compliance Required for Reduced Penalty Under Section 11AC. The benefit of 25% penalty is available only if duty, interest and reduced penalty are paid within 30 days of the original adjudication order, not the Tribunal's order.

25 Jun 2012

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal Without Pre-deposit in Classification Dispute — Tribunal's Discretion Must Be Exercised Consistently. Pre-deposit direction set aside as Tribunal failed to follow its own earlier order on identical issue under Section 129E of Customs Act, 1962.

25 Nov 2010

The appellant, Videocon Industries Ltd., a manufacturer of LCD TVs, had been regularly importing Liquid Crystal Device – Thin Film Transistor Module...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)