Search Results for "Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946"

122 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 122 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM Petition Against Union Recognition in Industrial Dispute. Court upholds Industrial Court's finding that petitioner failed to prove loss of majority support by respondent union under Section 22 of Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946.

The petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows BEST's Petition Against Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practices — Increments and Leave Benefits for Daily Wagers Upheld Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BEST), challenged a judgment and order dated 17th October 2019 passed by the Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Cooperative Bank Challenging Industrial Court Order for Permanent Employment of Clerk. Model Standing Orders Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act Apply to Cooperative Banks, Prohibiting Contract Appointments for Clerical Staff.

The petitioner, Nagpur Mahila Nagri Sahakari Bank Limited, a cooperative bank, challenged the judgment and order dated 29.10.2014 passed by the Indust...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Termination of Probationer Without Inquiry. Automatic Termination Clause in Appointment Letter Held Invalid as Termination Was Stigmatic and Required Domestic Inquiry Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, WIKA Instruments India Pvt. Ltd., challenged the judgment and award of the Labour Court dated 14 November 2011, which held that the te...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Municipal Corporation Challenging Reinstatement of Bus Driver in Gross Negligence Case. The Industrial Court's finding that the bus driver was not negligent was based on evidence and not perverse, and thus no interference under Article 227 was warranted.

The petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (BEST Undertaking), challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, dated 16 August 2007,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Summary jurisdiction under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act does not bar determination of disputed employer-employee relationship when status is prima facie established.

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd., the employer, challenging identical orders passed by the Labour Court a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Recall of Elected Representatives Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 — Labour Officer's Order Upheld for Lack of Sufficient Reasons in Recall Requisition.

The petitioners, Mahindra and Mahindra Employees' Union and its members, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals of Retired Employees Against Cooperative Bank's SARFAESI Recovery Proceedings. Employees Held Not to Be 'Borrowers' and Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Auction Sale Without Payment of Dues.

The judgment pertains to a batch of Letters Patent Appeals filed by retired employees of Shamrao Vithal Cooperative Bank Ltd. against the dismissal of...