Search Results for "Arrest legality"

176 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 176 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Partially Allows Claimants' Appeal in Motor Accident Compensation Case — Negligence of Driver and Owner Established, But Tribunal Erred in Computing Income and Applying Multiplier.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of Nandishappa, who died in a road accident on 20.07.2013. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Judicial Pronouncement on Criminal Appeals Quashing of Proceedings and Anticipatory Bail Granted

The requirements and procedures related to the filing of chargesheets in criminal cases under Section 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Advisory Board Opinion in COFEPOSA Detention Case — Advisory Board's Opinion of No Sufficient Cause for Detention is Non-Justiciable and Not Subject to Challenge Under Article 136

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India against the opinion of the Advisory Board constituted under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Sarpanch in Corruption Case. Registration of FIR and arrest under Prevention of Corruption Act constitutes disgraceful conduct under Section 39(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, justifying removal without awaiting conviction.

The petitioner, Dr. Narendra Purushottam Ingole, was elected as a Member of Gram Panchayat Wadki in June 2015 and subsequently elected as Sarpanch. A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in MSRTC Cash Robbery Case. Evidence of Injured Employees and Medical Reports Sufficient to Prove Robbery and Hurt Under Sections 394 and 332 IPC.

The applicant, Suresh Ananda Lohar, along with another accused Jagannath Shenekar, was prosecuted for offences under Sections 394 (robbery) and 332 (v...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Police Officer in Complaint by Judicial Officer for Assault on Accused. The court held that a judicial officer should not file a complaint in his own court for an offence alleged against an accused produced before him, as it compromises judicial impartiality.

The applicant, a police officer (PSI), filed a criminal application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and inherent powers of the High Cou...