Search Results for "Advocates Act, 1961"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Advocates Act, 1961"

968 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 968 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Constitution Bench Examines Applicability of Part I of Arbitration Act, 1996 to Foreign-Seated Arbitrations. Reference Arises from Conflicting Views in Bhatia International and Venture Global Engineering.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court of India, by a reference order dated 16 January 2008, directed the listing of Civil Appeal No. 7019 of 2005 and connected matters be...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Senior Advocate for Criminal Contempt in Gujarat High Court Case. Scandalous Allegations Against Judiciary and Registry Constitute Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c)(i) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

11 May 2026

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal against the conviction of appellant, President of the Gujarat High Court Advocates' Association and a desig...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeals in Section 153A Search Assessment Dispute — Assessing Officer Can Assess Total Income Including Non-Incriminating Material. The Court held that under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Assessing Officer is competent to assess total income considering all material on record, not limited to incriminating material found during search.

24 Apr 2023

This batch of appeals involves a common question of law regarding the scope of assessment under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Bar Council Rule Limiting Regular Approval of Law Colleges to Five Years. Rule 2(xxiv) of the Rules of Legal Education 2008 Held Intra Vires the Advocates Act, 1961; Permanent Approval Status Not Recognized Under New Rules.

8 Apr 2020

The petitioners, Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University and its Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar College of Law, challenged the validity of Rule 2(xxiv) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Petitions Challenging Mumbai Port Trust's Summary Eviction Notices Under Bye-law No.9. Petitioners Sought Declaration That Bye-law No.9 Ultra Vires Public Premises Act and Violated Natural Justice.

27 Mar 2018

In a batch of writ petitions, occupants of structures at Reay Road, Mazgaon, Mumbai, challenged eviction notices issued by the Mumbai Port Trust on 06...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench Adjudicates Regular First Appeal in Partition Suit Concerning Re-granted Walikaraki Lands Under KVOA Act. Core Issue: Junior Family Members’ Entitlement to Share in Lands Re-granted to Senior Branch After Abolition of Village Office.

14 Dec 2017

The dispute pertains to a suit for partition filed by the respondents/plaintiffs against the appellants/defendants regarding agricultural lands and ho...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Medical Council Enquiry Proceedings — Advocate's Right to Appear Under Section 32 of Advocates Act, 1961 Upheld. The court held that the Karnataka Medical Council had discretion to permit an advocate to appear on behalf of the respondent doctor, and the petitioner's objection was not sustainable.

3 Dec 2015

The petitioner, V. Damothiran, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders dated May 23, 2013 and ...

High Court

KAHC010364002010_1

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Income Tax Order for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 269UN of Income Tax Act, 1961. Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred as Appropriate Authority's Order Under Chapter XXC Is Final and Conclusive.

7 Apr 2014

The plaintiff, Sasmita Investments Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay High Court challenging an order passed by the Appropriate Authority under Chapter ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Split Bench Delivers Dissenting Opinion on Bar Council Election Rules Validity; Dissenting Judge Holds Rules 6(h) and 32(g) Intra Vires Advocates Act. The dissenting opinion concluded that the impugned election rules did not violate Sections 3(2)(b), 3(4) and 49(1)(a) of the Advocates Act, 1961.

13 Dec 2006

This matter concerned two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the validity of certain rules of the Bar Council of Maharashtr...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)