WRIT PETITION NO. 2973 OF 2025
1 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Acquisition Quashed"
1434 result(s) found
Found 1434 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Compensation and Betterment Charges for CIDCO Metro Project. Court upholds compensation determined under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and rejects waiver of betterment charges under CIDCO Act.
4 Mar 2025The judgment pertains to a group of five writ petitions filed by landowners whose lands were acquired for the Metro Centre project of CIDCO in Panvel,...
- 761
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Declares Land Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Due to Non-Compliance with Time Limit. Award Excluding Subject Lands and Subsequent Inaction for Over Two Decades Leads to Lapsing of Acquisition Proceedings.
11 Dec 2024The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Laxman Mahadev Katkar, challenged the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Ma...
- 732
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Navi Mumbai Airport Project — Petitioner's Title Not Established. Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Sections 4, 6, 9, 11 — Petitioner failed to prove ownership or possession of acquired land; compensation rightly awarded to recorded tenants.
2 May 2023The petitioner, Ashok Hari Shitlani, filed a writ petition challenging the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for the ...
- 45
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Development Authority in Land Acquisition and Urban Scheme Case Due to Valid Delegation and Implementation. Delegation of Power to Collector Under Section 5-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Was Implicit and Valid, and Scheme Did Not Lapse Under Section 54 of Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973, as Substantial Steps Were Taken Within Three Years.
3 Mar 2023The Supreme Court heard appeals by the Indore Development Authority (IDA) against a common judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court that had quashed ...
- 292
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Acquisition Order Under MHADA Act Due to Non-Compliance and Delay. Land Acquisition Proposal Sanctioned in 2006 Set Aside as Authority Failed to Complete Acquisition Within Reasonable Period, Rendering the Order Unenforceable.
31 Aug 2021The petitioners, H.I.M.S. Botawala Charities (a public charitable trust) and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Notification for Road Construction Due to Malafides and Non-Compliance with Government Circular. Acquisition Initiated at Behest of Minister Without Proper Application of Mind Under Section 6 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
6 Mar 2020The petitioners, Dr. Agnelo Lopes and Mr. Milton Lopes, challenged a notification dated 16th December 2009 issued under Section 6 of the Land Acquisit...
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Land Acquisition Notifications under Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 on Grounds of Non-Compliance with LARR Act, 2013. Petitioners Alleged That Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Taking of Possession Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, and That Procedural Irregularities Vitiated the Notifications.
20 Dec 2017The petitioners, owners of agricultural land in Jalna, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation ...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications for Lack of Public Purpose and Non-Compliance with KIADB Act. Acquisition for Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board fails as the Board is not an industrial concern under Section 2(7) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.
15 Dec 2016The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Amani Bellandur Khane Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, challenged the preliminary notifi...
- 98
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Award — Petitioners Fail to Establish Entitlement to Higher Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the Reference Court's findings on market value based on evidence cannot be interfered with in writ jurisdiction unless perverse.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a writ petition filed by seven individuals (petitioners) against the State of Goa, the Land Acquisition Officer, and eight private r...
- 100
