Search Results for "section 34"

604 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 604 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Development Dispute. Court Upholds Damages for Breach but Disallows Compound Interest.

The judgment arises from two arbitration appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common order dated 25th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheating and Forgery Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Complainant Failed to Prove That Accused Forged Documents or Cheated Him in Plot Sale Transaction Under Sections 420, 468, 471, 109 read with Section 34 IPC.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by the original informant, Sharad Bonde, and an appeal by the State of Maharashtra against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Limitation Dispute Between Contractor and Municipal Corporation. Court holds that cause of action for arbitration arose on rejection of claim by Commissioner on 6th January 2000, not on earlier dates, and thus reference was within limitation.

The case involves two appeals filed by M/s. R.N. Ghanekar & Co. (Appellant) and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (Respondent) against a com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Based on Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator. Unilateral Appointment Does Not Violate Section 12(5) Read with Seventh Schedule When Arbitrator Not Disqualified and Objection Waived by Participation.

The petitioners, Hanuman Motors Pvt. Ltd. and another, challenged an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator appointed by the respondent, M/s. Tata...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Cotton Supply Dispute. Consolidation of Claims from Nine Contracts with Identical Terms Does Not Violate Fundamental Policy of Indian Law Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, BST Textile Mills Pvt. Ltd., entered into nine contracts with the respondent, The Cotton Corporation of India Ltd., for the purchase o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Mysore Minerals Limited in Arbitration Challenge — Rejects Reappreciation of Evidence Under Section 34. Court holds that arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contract terms is final and not perverse, affirming dismissal of petition to set aside award.

The appellant, Mysore Minerals Limited (MML), a government undertaking engaged in mineral extraction and export, issued a tender notice on 18.5.1995 i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Under National Highways Act — Enhancement of Compensation Granted Based on Comparable Sale Deeds. Market Value Determined at Rs. 150 per sq. ft. with Additional Benefits Under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956.

The appellant, Sri G. Ravishankar, owned 22,869 sq. ft. of land in Sy. No.49/2 of Aimangala village, Hiriyur Taluk, Chitradurga District, which was ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Chit Company's Writ Petitions Challenging Arbitration Awards Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Arbitral Awards Under Section 34 of the Act

The petitioner, M/s Shriram Chits (K) Private Ltd, a chit company, filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution before the High...