Search Results for "minimum imprisonment"

761 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 761 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband and Co-Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Sections 302, 498A, and 109 IPC set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not reliable.

The case involves an appeal by Sanjay Ramkrushna Bhatkar (appellant No. 1) and Kiran Sukhdev Muley (appellant No. 2) against their conviction by the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder of security guard, relying on motive, last seen together, and recovery of weapon.

The appellant, Sunil Kewat, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nagpur for the murder of Ruksana Bano, a security guard, under Section 302 IPC and se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for strangulation of a sex worker set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jaydeep @ Papya Rajanikant Bhate, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of Sapna, a sex worker, under Section 302 of the Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Eknath s/o Laxman Gaikwad, was a Lineman (Assistant Lineman) employed at the Fuse Call Centre of Maharashtra State Electricity Board (M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction from Dacoity to Robbery with Hurt in Appeal Against Sessions Court Judgment. Appellant Convicted Under Section 394 IPC Instead of Sections 395 and 397 IPC as Prosecution Failed to Prove Presence of Five Persons for Dacoity.

The appellant, Balu Pandharinath Takle, was one of four accused charged with dacoity under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for al...