Search Results for "Project affected persons"

608 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 608 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Rejection of Plaint and Amendment in Specific Performance Suit — Consent Decree Not Binding on Third Party. Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Limitation Was a Mixed Question of Fact and Law.

The petitioner, Bharat Mulji Khona, was the defendant in a suit for specific performance filed by M/s. Fiza Construction Company (respondent no.1) see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses State of Goa's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Bridge Construction Dispute, Upholding Rejection of Objections Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

The State of Goa appealed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the rejection of its objections under Section 34 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes PMLA Proceedings Against Advocate Applicant in Money Laundering Case Involving Anil Deshmukh -- Properties Purchased in 2005-2007 Have No Nexus with Alleged 2020-2021 Proceeds of Crime

The High Court allowed the criminal application filed by Applicant under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., quashing the process issued against him by the De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Order Refusing Interim Relief in Development Agreement Dispute. Court Upholds Trial Court's Discretion in Refusing Injunction Where Balance of Convenience Favored Status Quo and No Irreparable Loss Was Shown.

The appellant, Villa Realcon LLP, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated September...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Sessions Court's Revision Order Against Issuance of Process. Order of Issuance of Process Under Section 204 CrPC is Interlocutory and Not Revisable Under Section 397(2) CrPC.

The petitioner, Sharad Vasant Sawant, filed a complaint under Sections 406 and 420 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 against respondent nos....