Search Results for "Auction Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Auction Rules"

827 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 827 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Orders for Lack of Jurisdiction — Orders Passed Without Deciding Application for Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Are Illegal. Trial Court Must First Decide Preliminary Issue of Jurisdiction Before Proceeding with Interim Applications.

12 Dec 2017

The petitioners filed writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders dated 13.04.2017 and 17.07.2017 passed by the X...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Patna Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Advertisement Royalty Dispute — Distinguishes Royalty from Tax and Upholds Corporation's Power to Charge Royalty Based on Agreement. The Court held that royalty is a contractual consideration, not a tax, and does not require legislative sanction under Article 265 of the Constitution.

17 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals by the Patna Municipal Corporation against a Division Bench judgment of the Patna High Court which had held that ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Mortgage Redemption Suit, Reinstating Decree for Redemption. Purchaser from Mortgagor Held Necessary Party in Foreclosure Suit Under Order XXXIV Rule 1 CPC, and Right to Redeem Not Extinguished by Decree Against Original Mortgagors Under Section 60 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

17 Aug 2021

The dispute arose from a mortgage redemption suit involving land mortgaged in 1954. The plaintiff purchased the mortgaged land via registered sale dee...

High Court

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 984 of 2018

18 Jun 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Reference in Sales Tax Case — Sale to Purchaser's Branches in Another State Constitutes Inter-State Sale Under Section 3(a) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Movement of Goods from Maharashtra to Vapi and Silvasa Occasioned by Sale, Hence Inter-State Sale.

12 Aug 2010

The applicant, M/s K.C. Metal Industries, a manufacturer and seller of copper strips and bars registered under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 and the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Amalgamation Notification for Lack of Consent — Amalgamation Under Section 44 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act Requires Consent of Both Market Committees. Withdrawal of Consent by One Committee Renders the Process Invalid.

17 Aug 2010

The petitioners, Sopanrao Sathe (Chairman) and the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Malkapur, challenged a notification dated 17-01-2009 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against CIDCO's Refusal to Grant NOC for Additional FSI for IT/ITES Development. Government Order dated 31st August 2009 enabling additional FSI for IT/ITES use is binding on CIDCO as a planning authority.

11 Jun 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Shakti Commercial Premises Society Ltd., a cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Coop. Societies Act, 1960, filed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking TDR for Land Acquired Under MRTP Act — Transferable Development Rights Claim Barred by Limitation as Application Filed Beyond Reasonable Period After Possession. The court held that a claim for TDR under Section 126(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 must be made within a reasonable period, and a delay of seven years from the date of possession disentitles the claimant.

10 Sep 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Karan Developers, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Pune Municipal Corporati...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Consumer Forum Orders Against Company in Liquidation — Jurisdiction of Consumer Forum Barred After Appointment of Official Liquidator Under Companies Act, 1956. The court held that once a winding up order is passed, the Company Court has exclusive jurisdiction over the company's assets, and the Consumer Forum cannot proceed without leave of the Company Court under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956.

29 Jan 2013

The petitioner, Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Sandhu, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa seeking to quash orders dated 17.10.2006, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Permanent Stay of Winding Up of Svadeshi Mills Company Limited. Section 466 of Companies Act, 1956 does not permit stay of winding up after assets have been sold and substantial progress made in liquidation.

23 Aug 2013

The case concerns an appeal against the dismissal of a company application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking a permanent stay of t...

56 57 58 59 60

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)