Search Results for "composite property"

584 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 584 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Policy Exclusion for Non-Paid Driver Upheld. Insurer not liable for accident caused by driver not holding valid licence and not covered under policy terms.

The case involves a motor accident claim where the appellant, The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., challenged the award of the Motor Accident Claims T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit: Sun Pharma's 'SUN' Mark Protected Against 'ABSUN'. Deceptive similarity established as dominant feature 'SUN' is common; addition of prefix 'AB' insufficient to distinguish under Section 29(2)(b) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiff, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, Satej M. Katekar, proprietor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Dismissal of Execution Petition on Limitation and Inexecutability Grounds — Decree Holder Granted Relief Under Article 227. Executing Court Erred in Holding Decree Inexecutable Without Considering Order XXI Rule 32 CPC.

The petitioner, Smt. I A Kasturi, was the Decree Holder in Execution Petition No.722/2019 before the VII Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru. She f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Maritime Board Dispute Over Cargo Handling Charges. Court sets aside majority award directing payment at Rs.3 per metric tonne, remits matter for fresh consideration on applicability of 1995 or 1996 policy.

The Maharashtra Maritime Board (Claimant) filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging a m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petitions for Non-Prosecution Due to Non-Compliance with Directions. Failure to File Affidavit of Documents and Appear Before Court Leads to Dismissal Under Rule 34 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959.

The judgment concerns two company petitions (CP 496/2014 and CP 497/2014) filed by Janak Herkishen Vaswani and Mrs. Renuka Herkishen Vaswani respectiv...