Search Results for "award quashing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "award quashing"

1057 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1057 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Life Ban on Cricketer in BCCI Spot-Fixing Case — Disciplinary Committee's Findings Based on Audio Recordings and Commissioner's Report Upheld. The Court held that the standard of proof in domestic disciplinary proceedings is preponderance of probabilities, and the BCCI's decision was not perverse.

15 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by cricketer S. Sreesanth challenging the life ban imposed by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Corporation's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Backwages. Driver's Dismissal for Accident Found Disproportionate as No Misconduct Proven, Labour Court's Discretion Upheld.

20 Feb 2025

The petitioner, the Divisional Controller of NWKRTC, challenged the order dated 25.09.2019 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Hubballi in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Notification Declaring Company as Relief Undertaking Under Bombay Relief Undertakings (Special Provisions) Act, 1958 — No Violation of Article 14 or Article 19(1)(g) Found. The notification was issued to protect the company from legal proceedings and to enable its revival, and the court held that the Act does not require prior hearing or publication of reasons.

21 Mar 2012

The petitioners, residents of a housing society and social activists, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to LPG Distributor Selection Guidelines and Advertisement. Guidelines Providing for Objective Criteria Including Land Ownership and Financial Capacity Upheld as Valid.

18 Mar 2016

The petitioners, Suresh Pralhad Pawar and Balasaheb Mahadeo Kshirsagar, filed writ petitions challenging the advertisement dated 27th July 2011 issued...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Discriminatory Tender Conditions in Telecom Infrastructure Bid. Eligibility criteria requiring prior experience in road development and minimum turnover of Rs. 100 crores held arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

8 Aug 2016

The petitioner, High-G Transmissions Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company registered as an Infrastructure Provider under the Indian Telegraph Act, 188...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Commercial Court Order in Arbitration Dispute Over Appointment of Arbitrator — Holds That Section 11(6) Application Under Arbitration Act Is Not Maintainable Before Commercial Court Without Prior Notice Under Section 21.

20 Dec 2024

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12.01.2021 passed by the Commercial Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Student's Petition Challenging Unfair Means Penalty in Veterinary Exam. Court upholds University's decision to declare student failed and disentitled from compartmental examination for using unfair means during 3rd year B.V.Sc. & A.H. examination.

28 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Chaitanya Haridas Tirpude, a 23-year-old student in the 3rd year of the Bachelor of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry (B.V.Sc. &...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Industrial Development — Petitioners Failed to Show Violation of Statutory Provisions. The Court held that the acquisition under the KIAD Act, 1966 was valid and the petitioners were not entitled to higher compensation as they had already received enhanced compensation under a consent award.

3 Jun 2019

The petitioners, Smt. Kempamma and others, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition for Benefit of Government Resolution Dated 17.10.1988 in Service Matter — Petitioner Entitled to Pay Revision and Arrears as Per Precedents. The Court held that the petitioner, working in the same post and organization as in earlier cases, is entitled to the benefit of Government Resolution dated 17.10.1988 and pay revision as per Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Pay Commission recommendations.

5 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Nanjibhai Bijlabhai Pariya, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat High C...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging 1961 Land Acquisition as Barred by Delay and Laches. Petitioner's claim for restoration of land acquired over six decades ago fails due to unexplained delay and lack of locus standi.

23 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Amratlal Ishwarlal Patel, aged about 84 years and a retired Central Government pensioner, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat Hig...

55 56 57 58 59

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)