Search Results for "Section 164 statement"

1395 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1395 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes FIR in Matrimonial Dispute. Court holds that a married woman living with her parents voluntarily cannot be the subject of habeas corpus, and that the husband's FIR for kidnapping and impersonation was an abuse of process.

The judgment involves two connected writ petitions. The first petition (Criminal Writ Petition No.2757 of 2004) was filed by Iftekar Usman Shaikh unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award — Holds That Single Judge Erred in Setting Aside Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. The Court Reinstated the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Oral Agreement and Quantum of Damages.

The appellant, Ratnam Sudesh Iyer, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the judgment of a learned Si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeal Against Conviction in Murder Case. The Appeal Challenges the Validity of the Trial Court's Judgment on Grounds of Insufficient Evidence and Lack of Common Intention.

The Criminal Appeal arose from the conviction of four accused persons by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Dharwad, in S.C.No.131/2016 for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Complainant Mother in POCSO Case — Acquittal of Accused Set Aside for Non-Examination of Material Witness. Trial Court's Failure to Summon the Victim's Father, a Key Witness, Rendered the Acquittal Unsustainable Under Section 372 CrPC.

The appellant, Smt. Rajavva, the mother of the victim, filed a criminal appeal under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Brother's Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302, 506(II) IPC and Arms Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Dilip Madhukar Jadhav, was convicted by the 2nd Ad-Hoc Additional Sessions Judge at Kalyan for the murder of his brother Ravindra Jadha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Penetrative Sexual Assault Conviction Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 5(l) r/w 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

The appellant, Murugan, was convicted by the Fast Track Mahila Court, Theni, in Special S.C.No.27 of 2020 for offences under Section 5(l) read with Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Judgment on Appeals Against Conviction in S.C.No.122/2015; Conviction Under Sections 302 and 394 IPC Challenged by Accused.

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, considered three criminal appeals filed by convicted accused Nos. 1 to 3 against the judgment and order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Rape Case Due to Consensual Relationship and Delay in FIR. The court held that the relationship appeared consensual and the delay in filing FIR raised doubts, entitling the accused to bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

The petitioner, Narasappa, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking regular bail in C.C. No. 1362/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Three Minor Girls Under POCSO Act and IPC. Life imprisonment confirmed for repeated sexual assault on children aged 5-7 years, with court finding testimony of victims credible and corroborated by medical evidence.

The appellant, Kamlesh Janardhan Walde, was convicted by the Special Judge in Special Criminal (Child) Case No.33/2016 for offences under Section 376(...