WRIT PETITION NO.1807 OF 2024
21 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "Regulatory Compliance"
738 result(s) found
Found 738 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Company Directors in PF Embezzlement Case Due to Lack of Criminal Intent and Civil Nature of Dispute. Directors Not Vicariously Liable for Company's Failure to Deposit PF Amounts Under Section 14 of Employees' Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 When Dispute Is Essentially Civil.
17 Jan 2024The petitioners, M/s. Edunetwork Private Limited and its directors Geetansh Bamania and Ajay Nain, filed a criminal writ petition under Articles 226 a...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Act Applicability to Cooperative Banks and Arbitration Awards. Multi-State Cooperative Bank held to be a 'bank' under SARFAESI Act, and arbitration under Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act does not bar subsequent SARFAESI proceedings.
11 Jan 2024The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by borrowers challenging actions taken by Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank Ltd. and Piramal Capital and Ho...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging NOC Requirement for Construction Near Naval Area. Court holds that the requirement of NOC from Naval authorities for construction within 500 meters of naval installation is valid and not arbitrary.
27 Sep 2023The petitioners, Dolby Builders Private Ltd. and its shareholder Girish Agarwal, filed a writ petition challenging the requirement of a No Objection C...
- 148
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award Holding Put and Call Options in Share Purchase Agreement as Enforceable. The court held that clauses 8.5 and 8.5.1 of the Share Purchase Agreement are not forward contracts or derivatives under SCRA and SEBI circulars, and the Single Judge erred in setting aside the award.
2 Feb 2023The appellants, Percept Finserve Private Limited and Percept Limited, entered into a Share Purchase Agreement with Edelweiss Financial Services Limite...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.
23 Mar 2022The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...
- 72
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in National Green Tribunal Jurisdiction Dispute Over Forest Clearances. The Court held that the National Green Tribunal must entertain an original application under Section 14(1) of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 when no order under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 exists, as Stage-I Forest Clearance alone does not trigger appellate jurisdiction under Section 16(e).
16 Nov 2021The dispute arose from a challenge by Citizens for Green Doon, an environmental group, against Stage-I Forest Clearances and a Wildlife Clearance issu...
- 307
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to NLSIU's Separate Admission Test NLAT — Upholds University's Autonomy in Admission Process. NLSIU's decision to conduct its own entrance exam for 2020-21, deviating from CLAT, was held to be within its statutory powers under the NLSIU Act, 1986, and not arbitrary.
11 Sep 2020The judgment arises from a public interest writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India by Rakesh Kumar Agarwalla, father of a st...
- 233
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Relaxes Stringent Bail Conditions for Medical Students Accused of Abetting Suicide: Suspension of Medical Licenses and Restriction on Leaving Mumbai Modified. The Court held that suspension of medical licenses pending trial is disproportionate and violates the right to practice profession under Article 19(1)(g), and modified conditions to allow professional practice and completion of education.
8 Sep 2020The appellants, three postgraduate medical students, were accused of abetting the suicide of their junior colleague, Dr. Payal Tadvi, who belonged to ...
- 183
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit and Recruitment Interval Rules for Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. Rules 8(1) and 12 of UPHJS Rules, 1975 Held Valid as Not Manifestly Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 16.
29 Jan 2019The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The petitioner...
- 265
