Search Results for "dangerous activities"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "dangerous activities"

759 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 759 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MCOCA Case for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and Lack of Satisfying Material Renders Preventive Detention Invalid. The court held that the detaining authority must consider all relevant facts, including the fact that the detenu was on bail, and failure to do so vitiates the detention order under Section 3(1) of MCOCA.

14 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Avinash Gopal Shilimkar, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOCA) by an order d...

High Court

High Court Condemns Demolition by Municipal Corporation Under Guise of DCPR 2034 Redevelopment Scheme. Appeal from Order Dismisses Demolition as High-handed and Illegal Under Regulation 33(9) of Development Control and Promotion Regulation 2034.

4 Apr 2025

The matter pertains to an appeal from order filed by M/s. Mehta & Co., a partnership firm through its partner Mr. Adarsh Varma, as original plaintiff,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MCOCA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by Detaining Authority. Failure to Consider Relevant Material and Mechanical Reproduction of Grounds Renders Preventive Detention Invalid.

7 Dec 2023

The petitioner, father of the detenu Ashish @ Sonu Manmurad Pande, filed a writ petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissioner of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

26 Nov 2015

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Section 57 of Bombay Police Act, 1950 for Non-Compliance with Section 59 — Failure to Consider Less Drastic Measures and Provide Opportunity of Hearing. Externment Order Set Aside as Authority Did Not Comply with Mandatory Requirements of Section 59 of Bombay Police Act, 1950.

5 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Ashok @ Aau s/o Pitambar Choudhary, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 14, 21, 226, and 227 of the Constitution of India ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Pan Masala Manufacturers in Challenge to Maharashtra Gutka Ban — Petitioners Allowed to Continue Manufacturing Outside State Pending Final Hearing. Court Found Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience in Favour of Petitioners Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

15 Sep 2012

The petitioners, companies engaged in the manufacture, supply, and distribution of pan masala containing tobacco (gutka) and pan masala not containing...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under M.P.D.A. Act for Non-Placement of Bail Orders Before Detaining Authority — Failure to Consider Vital Material Renders Subjective Satisfaction Invalid. The court held that bail conditions imposed by courts are vital material that must be placed before the detaining authority for consideration before recording subjective satisfaction under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

23 Jul 2012

The petitioner, Baban Prakash Ranware, challenged a detention order dated 14.2.2012 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune under the Maharashtra P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Detention Under MPDA Act — Preventive Detention Order Quashed for Non-Application of Mind and Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. The court held that the detaining authority must consider whether the detenu can be dealt with under ordinary law before ordering preventive detention under the MPDA Act.

20 Dec 2011

The petitioners, Sumit Sanjay Jaiswal and Shital Swapnil Jaiswal, filed two separate writ petitions challenging their detention orders passed under th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Communication of Grounds in Tamil Language — Right to Make Effective Representation Violated Under Article 22(5) of Constitution of India. The court held that failure to provide grounds of detention in a language understood by the illiterate Tamil-speaking detenu infringed his constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering the detention illegal.

19 Oct 2006

The petitioner, Anna Durai @ Dilli Ganpati Devendra, an illiterate Tamil-speaking person residing in Mumbai, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Compensation for Occupational Disease Against Monsanto Chemicals — No Causal Link Established Between Herbicide Exposure and Brain Hemorrhage. Court Held That Mere Employment in a Hazardous Industry Does Not Give Rise to a Presumption of Liability Without Proof of Nexus.

13 Jul 2006

The petitioner, Mangesh G. Salodkar, was employed as a trainee Production Executive at Monsanto Chemicals of India Ltd.'s plant in Lonavala from 15 Ap...

54 55 56 57 58

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)