Search Results for "Belated Application"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Belated Application"

1428 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1428 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order Refusing to Reopen Evidence in Partition Suit. Court holds that Order 18 Rule 17 CPC cannot be used to fill gaps in evidence or to re-examine witnesses on matters already covered, and that the trial court's discretion in refusing to reopen evidence was not perverse or arbitrary.

19 Nov 2015

The petitioners, who are plaintiffs in a partition suit (O.S. No. 100/2007) pending before the Principal Civil Judge, Bangalore Rural District, filed ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order Allowing Amendment of Plaint in Partition Suit Due to Lack of Due Diligence and Impermissible Challenge to Compromise Decree. Amendment Sought at Fag End of Trial to Add Declaration Prayer Was Rejected as Oversight Alone Does Not Satisfy Proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC and Remedy for Compromise Decree Lies Only Before Same Court Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

29 Feb 2024

The dispute arose from a suit for partition of ancestral property filed by respondents No. 1 and 2 in 2005. They pleaded the existence of a compromise...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Compassionate Appointment Case Due to Delay and Inclusion of Pension in Income. Family pension can be considered in assessing indigent circumstances, and a seven-year delay in filing writ petition is fatal to the claim.

16 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Himachal Pradesh against the judgment of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh which had direc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Property Suit Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC — No Prejudice to Defendants as Trial Not Commenced. Amendment sought to convert suit from injunction to partition is permissible when no evidence has been led and no vested right is affected.

8 Dec 2021

The petitioners, original defendants in Regular Civil Suit No.60 of 1988, challenged the order of the Ad-hoc District Judge-8, Pune dated 10/01/2020, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order Allowing Additional Evidence Under Order 18 Rule 4 CPC. Trial Court's Discretion to Permit Proof of Compromise Deed Executed After Evidence Closed Upheld as Not Perverse.

24 Jan 2018

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original defendant, challenged an order dated 10 March 2017 passed by the Civil Judge Junior Division, Khandala, i...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular Second Appeals in Partition Dispute. Appellants Challenge First Appellate Court's Reversal of Trial Court Decrees Under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

10 Jul 2026

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Defendant's Application for Leave to Produce Additional Documents in Suit for Specific Performance of Gas Supply Contract. Court Holds That Internal Documents Sought to Be Produced Were Neither Relevant Nor Disclosed in Earlier Affidavits, and Application Was a Malafide Dilatory Tactic.

29 Jan 2016

The chamber summons arose in a suit filed in 2005 by NTPC Ltd. against Reliance Industries Ltd. for a declaration that a valid and binding contract ex...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Summary Suit for Recovery of Balance Consideration Under Agreement for Sale. Court holds that leave to defend cannot be granted on the basis of vague and unsubstantiated allegations of payment in cash, and that the defendant failed to raise a triable issue.

22 Apr 2024

The appellant-defendant, Vikram Trimbak Pawar, entered into an Agreement for Sale dated 23 November 2016 with the respondent-plaintiff, Technocrat Con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 28A Limitation in Land Acquisition Act — Three-Month Period for Redetermination of Compensation Held Constitutional. The court ruled that the three-month limitation under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is reasonable and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution, as the classification between award acceptors and Section 18 reference seekers is valid.

24 Jul 2012

The petitioner, Surendrakumar Madhusudan Mor, owned land bearing Gat No.128 admeasuring 5.27 hectares at mouza Pimpri (Hatgaon), Taluka and District Y...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award in Land Sale Dispute. Court Holds That Section 34 Petition Cannot Be Used to Reappreciate Evidence and That Award Was Not Perverse.

30 Aug 2019

The case involves an arbitration appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the judgment of the Principal Dist...

54 55 56 57 58

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)