Search Results for "property identification"

1072 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1072 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Death of Employee Due to Lack of Safety Measures. Employer and Principal Employer Held Jointly and Severally Liable Under Section 3 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The appeal was filed by the claimants, the legal representatives of the deceased Chinnaswamy, who died due to electrocution on 14.08.2013 while workin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 - Conviction Set Aside for Failure to Inform Appellant of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate.

The appellant, Shridhar Laxman Chennuri, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Rioting and Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 326, 504, 506 of IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves an appeal against conviction in Sessions Trial No. 544 of 1998. The appellants, Bhaurao Dangarkar and three others, were convicted f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Doubtful Identification and Contradictory Evidence. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 302, 325 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case arises from a criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 30th May 1991 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, in Sess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Murder and Robbery Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Recovery of Stolen Articles and Last Seen Evidence Form Complete Chain Pointing to Guilt Under Sections 302, 392, 397, 452 IPC.

The appellant, Santosh @ Santu s/o Jagasharan Pandey, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai in Sessions Case No.221 of 1999 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application and Appoints Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Termination of Procurement Agreement. Pre-Arbitral Negotiation Clause Held Not Mandatory Condition Precedent Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

This is an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Tech Mahindra Ltd. against Tata Communications Transfor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Doubtful Identification and Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Popat Bapu Mandale, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of Ashok Jadhav, and sentenced ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302 and 323 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Nazimoddin Mohammaddin alias Nasiroddin, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nanded, for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 32...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Tukaram Parshuram Mane, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gadhinglaj for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Cor...