Search Results for "layout development"

1135 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1135 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Unauthorized Construction and Inaction by Municipal Corporation — Directions Issued to MCGM to Act Within Four Weeks. Resident's Locus Standi Upheld Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Sections 351, 354, 355A, 488.

The petitioner, Dr. Rahul Jain, a resident of Borivali West, Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Reduces Compensation in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Comparability of Sale Deeds and Awards. Reference Court Erred in Relying on Ex.P-41 Without Examining Whether Lands Were Comparable.

The case involves an appeal by the Bijapur Urban Development Authority (BUDA) and a cross-objection by the claimants (landowners) against the judgment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA's Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of No Prima Facie Title. BDA Failed to Establish Ownership Over Suit Property as Revenue Records Showed Private Ownership, and No Acquisition Proceedings Were Proven.

The judgment arises from two connected Regular First Appeals filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and dec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010159832015_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Hotel Construction Under MRTP Act. Petitioner's failure to obtain valid building permission and previous Division Bench upholding notice under Section 53(1) of Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 leads to dismissal.

The petitioner, Satish D. Darekar, was served with a notice under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act) by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Contractual Forfeiture Case — HUDCO Cannot Forfeit Payments Without Fulfilling Reciprocal Obligations. Allotment Cancellation and Forfeiture of Rs. 28.11 Crores Set Aside as Unjust Enrichment Where Lessor Failed to Execute Agreement to Sub-Lease.

The dispute arose from an allotment letter issued by HUDCO to Tomorrowland Limited for a 99-year lease of land to build a 5-star hotel. The appellant ...