WRIT PETITION NO.3602 OF 2022
20 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act"
555 result(s) found
Found 555 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in MHADA Redevelopment Case Upholding High Court's Decision on Writ Petition Maintainability. Court Finds No Interference with Contractual Rights as Agreements Were Unregistered and MHADA Had Authority Under Regulation 33(9) of Development Control and Promotion Regulations, 2034 to Issue E-Tender for Private Land Redevelopment.
16 Apr 2025The dispute arose from an e-tender issued by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) for the redevelopment of a privately owned...
- 459
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging PMRDA's Demand for Additional Premium for Change of User of Land. Held that once development permission is granted and construction completed, the authority cannot unilaterally demand additional premium without statutory basis.
10 Apr 2024The petitioner, B-Right Real Estate Limited, a real estate company, owned land in Pune within the jurisdiction of the Pune Metropolitan Region Develop...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses CIDCO's Writ Petition Challenging Review Order in Land Acquisition Reference. Held that review application under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC was maintainable as there was an error apparent on the face of the record regarding non-consideration of earlier judgments.
28 Mar 2024The present writ petition was filed by the Administrator, Nashik, City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. (CIDCO) challenging ...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Demolition of Illegal Construction on Gaothan Land in Cross Writ Petitions Between Trust and Corporation. Court holds that construction without valid building permission and in violation of development plan is illegal and liable for demolition under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.
19 Jul 2023The Bombay High Court dealt with two cross writ petitions: Writ Petition No.655 of 2021 filed by Our Lady of Dolours School Trust against the Municipa...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal of Building Plan Sanction by Nagpur Improvement Trust Due to PIL Prohibitory Order. Court Directs NIT to Consider Application on Merits Without Reference to PIL Order, Holding That Prohibitory Order Does Not Create Absolute Bar.
14 Feb 2023The petitioners, Kartiki Jagdish Pawar and Sanjyoti Jagdish Pawar, purchased a plot in Nagpur from Dashrath Balaji Kalambe, who had originally bought ...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction in Adverse Possession Suit — Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience in Favor of Plaintiffs. Trial Court's Order Restraining Defendants from Entering Suit Property Maintained as Plaintiffs Established Long-Standing Possession and Serious Triable Issues.
25 Jan 2021The case arises from an appeal filed by the defendants (Suruna Bothra Associates & Others) against an order dated 4th December 2020 passed by the Civi...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Surrender Condition Under DCR 33(7) Appendix III — Surplus Area Calculation Upheld. Petitioners Not Entitled to Deduct Municipal Market Area from Surplus Area to be Surrendered Under Clause 4 of Appendix III to DCR 33(7) of Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai, 1991.
22 Jun 2015The petitioners, M/s Aarts Module International Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition challenging clause 4 of Appendix III of Regulation 33(7) ...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Cooperative Housing Society Against Demolition Notice for Unauthorised Construction. Status Quo Order Vacated as Society Failed to Show Distinction from Other Similarly Situated Societies Whose Regularisation Was Rejected by Supreme Court.
24 Jul 2013The appellant, Shubh Apartments CHS Ltd., a cooperative housing society, filed an appeal against an order vacating the status quo granted in its favou...
- 201
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Challenge to Cancellation of NOC for Redevelopment Due to Misrepresentation of Tenant Status. Landlord's Failure to Disclose Correct Residential Status of Tenants Renders Permission Void Ab Initio Under DCR 33(7) and MHADA Act.
21 Aug 2012The petitioners, Dahyabhai Papers & Boards Pvt. Ltd. and another, owned a dilapidated cessed building in Mumbai. They applied for redevelopment under ...
- 90
