High Court of Judicature at Bombay Pronounced Judgment in Writ Petition (ST) No. 17105 of 2025; Court's Verdict and Reasoning Not Available in Extracted Text.
9 May 2025...
Search Results for "Bombay Public Trusts Act"
571 result(s) found
Found 571 result(s)
High Court
"High Court Invalidates Reassessment Notice Against Shri Saibaba Sansthan Trust Shirdi" "Reassessment quashed due to lack of new tangible material."
20 Dec 2024The Bombay High Court held that reopening of assessments under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, based on material already scrutinized during t...
- 229
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Nomination of Councillors Without Consultation with Party Leader. Section 63(2B) of Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 mandates consultation with leader of party before nomination.
27 Apr 2018The petitioners, Rajaram Appa Patil and Mangesh Sudhakar Tambe, filed a writ petition challenging the nomination of two councillors to the Municipal C...
- 101
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking De-reservation of Lecturer Post and Regularization of Services. Petitioner failed to establish any legal right to de-reservation or regularization under Government Resolution dated 5th December 1994.
20 Dec 2017The petitioner, Varsha Manohar Dhongade, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at B...
- 113
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Against Permission to Withdraw Suit with Liberty to File Fresh Suit. Withdrawal Allowed Under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC as Plaintiff Sought to Withdraw Due to Technical Defect, Not Abuse of Process.
8 Sep 2016The original defendants in Regular Civil Suit No. 22 of 2004 challenged the order dated 1st January 2014 passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge-1,...
- 224
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Seniority Determination in Assistant Teacher Cadre. Education Officer's Order Declaring Respondent No.4 as Senior and Entitled to Head Master Post Upheld Under Rule 12 of MEPS Rules, 1981.
31 Aug 2016The petitioner, Salim Gulab Mulla, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order passed by the Ed...
- 120
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Seniority Determination in Assistant Teacher Cadre — Continuous Service Length Decides Seniority Under Rule 12 of MEPS Rules, 1981. Education Officer's Order Upheld as Respondent No.4 Appointed Earlier, Hence Senior.
31 Aug 2016The petitioner, Salim Gulab Mulla, and respondent no.4, Sunil Ananta Devkule, were both assistant teachers at New English School, Mandhardeo, run by r...
- 110
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Refusal to Approve Appointment in Minority Institution — MEPS Rules Not Applicable to Non-Aided Minority Schools. Director of Vocational Education erred in applying Rule 9(7)-(10) of MEPS Rules to a non-aided minority institution, violating Article 30(1) of the Constitution.
7 Aug 2015The petitioners, Dr. Antonio Da Silva Technical High School and Junior College and its managing trust, are a non-aided minority educational institutio...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Lecturer's Writ Petition Challenging Termination Due to Lack of NET/SET Qualification. University's refusal to grant approval for appointment beyond academic year 1996-97 upheld as petitioner did not possess mandatory eligibility under UGC Regulations.
11 Jan 2010The petitioner, Prafull Dhondopant Kulkarni, was appointed as a Lecturer in English at Sharadchandra Arts and Commerce College, Naigaon Bazar, pursuan...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitration Award in Partnership Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Article 227 as Arbitrator's Findings Are Not Perverse or Contrary to Law. The court upheld the arbitral award and the appellate order, finding no patent illegality or perversity in the valuation of assets, goodwill, and interest awarded under the Partnership Act, 1932 and Arbitration Act, 1996.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, Satish Vasant Salpekar, and the respondents, Ashwin Ghatate and Jagjeet Singh, were partners in a firm. Disputes arose leading to diss...
- 126
