Search Results for "section 34"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "section 34"

604 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 604 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Notice Issued by Assistant Commissioner Under Disaster Management Act — Authority Not Competent to Exercise Powers Under Section 34. Only District Disaster Management Authority Constituted Under Section 25 Can Exercise Powers Under Section 34 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005.

5 May 2010

The petitioners, Bin K. Kuriakose and others, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Lack of Intent. Death of mentally ill man tied to pole by villagers held not amounting to culpable homicide under Section 304 Part II IPC as no intention or knowledge of likely death established.

30 Apr 2010

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 304 Part II read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The appellants, Dnyandeo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Violation of NSEIL Rules Renders Award Contrary to Public Policy. Trading Member's Squaring Off of Defaulting Client's Position Upheld as Permissible Under Bye-Laws, Award of Damages for Loss of Higher Price Set Aside.

11 Mar 2010

The petitioner, M/s. Ventura Securities Limited, a trading member of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSEIL), challenged an arbitral award d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be in Conflict with Public Policy or Suffering from Patent Illegality. The court held that the arbitrator's interpretation of the contract and byelaws was plausible and not perverse, and the award did not warrant interference.

11 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Rajendra Kumar Bothra, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Defence Transport Contract Dispute. Contractor Held Liable for Loss Despite Alleged Insistence by Respondent on Unsuitable Trailer.

10 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Shiv Ganga Transport Private Limited, entered into a contract with the respondent, the President of India through the Commandant, Emba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Constituent in Stock Trading Dispute — Technical Glitch Not a Valid Defense for Non-Execution of Order. The Court held that the Arbitrator's findings on facts and law were not patently illegal and did not warrant interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Feb 2010

The petitioner, M/s. Angel Broking Limited, a trading member of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in NIFTY Trade Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that petitioners failed to prove unauthorized trade and that credit note was accepted without objection.

11 Feb 2010

The petitioners, Intex Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. and its director Dinesh Mehta, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Lack of Jurisdiction Where Claim Exceeds 20% of Contract Value Under Special Conditions of Contract. The court held that the Arbitral Tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain claims exceeding 20% of the contract value as per Clause 41.2 of the Special Conditions of Contract, and the award was liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 Feb 2010

The petitioner, Union of India, through the Divisional Railway Manager (Works), Mumbai Division, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Stock Broking Disputes — Upholds Awards for Payment of Outstanding Dues with Interest. Claims of Bogus Trading and Unauthorized Transactions Remain Unproved Due to Lack of Evidence and Failure to Pursue Counterclaims.

15 Jan 2010

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed by Ms. Deepika Vijay Nihalani and Vijay Roopkumar Nihalani against INA Stock Broking Co. Pvt. Lt...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Grounds Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Established. Court upholds award holding petitioner liable for unauthorized trades and failure to prove respondent's instructions.

4 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Sytematix Shares & Stocks (India) Ltd., a stockbroker, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

52 53 54 55 56

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)