WA No. 1841 of 2026
8 Jul 2026The case concerns a writ appeal filed by the State of Tamil Nadu against an order of the single judge of the High Court of Madras in W.P.No.20295 of 2...
Search Results for "posting order"
657 result(s) found
Found 657 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Cyber Terrorism and Espionage in National Security Case. Appellant sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 66-F of Information Technology Act, 2000 and rigorous imprisonment under Official Secrets Act, 1923 for leaking defence data to foreign agents via fake Facebook accounts.
1 Dec 2025The appellant, Nishant Agrawal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-1, Nagpur in Sessions Case No.726 of 2021 for offences under Section 66...
- 99
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Rent Arrears Case — Service of Notice and Default in Payment of Rent Upheld. Concurrent findings of trial and appellate courts on tenant's failure to pay rent and valid service of demand notice under Section 12 of Bombay Rent Act, 1947 affirmed.
15 Jul 2024The case involves a dispute between the legal heirs of the original plaintiff-landlord (Mohamudkhan Kadar Khan Pathan) and the defendant-tenant (origi...
- 394
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Review Petitions in Service Matter — Upholds Quashing of Transfer Orders as Arbitrary. Transfer of employees without considering their representations and without following the policy of minimum tenure violates principles of natural justice and Article 14 of the Constitution.
30 Aug 2022The State of Maharashtra filed two review applications (Review Application (Civil) No.170 of 2022 and No.171 of 2022) before the Bombay High Court, Au...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Junior Clerk for Habitual Lateness in Judicial Service. Disciplinary action for repeated late attendance held proportionate and not violative of natural justice.
16 Sep 2016The petitioner, Mr. Rahul Suresh Kulkarni, was appointed as a Junior Clerk in the Civil Court at Karad on 11 July 2005. He worked for 118 days until 1...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Challenge to Transfer Order, Upholds Management's Right to Transfer Employees for Administrative Reasons. Transfer of Union Office Bearer Not Automatically Mala Fide; Employee Must Establish Malafide or Illegality to Resist Transfer.
5 Jul 2012The petitioner, Dharmarajya Kamgar Karmachari Mahasangh, a trade union, challenged an interlocutory order passed by the Industrial Court refusing to s...
- 80
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Dishonour of Cheque for Rs. 1,50,000 for Plot Purchase — Presumption Under Section 139 N.I. Act Not Rebutted by Accused.
3 May 2011The appellant, Smt. Y. Bangarama, filed a criminal appeal challenging the judgment and order dated 23rd July 2008 passed by the learned Judicial Magis...
- 214
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Promotion of Respondent No.5 in Municipal Corporation Case Due to Ultra Vires Action. Promotion of A.T. Shintre as Director under Section 54A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 set aside for being illegal and arbitrary.
6 Apr 2010The petitioners, employees of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Eviction Order in Caretaker Agreement Dispute. Licensee Not Entitled to Tenancy Protection Under Section 15A of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 as Agreement Was Not Bona Fide.
12 Jun 2006The case involves a dispute over Flat No.5, Sagar Mahal, Walkeshwar Road, Mumbai. The respondent, Dr. G.S. Shah, a medical doctor employed with Centra...
- 80
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Orders of MOIL Employees — Transfer Policy Upheld as Non-Discriminatory and in Public Interest. Transfer orders of 24 employees of MOIL Limited were challenged as arbitrary and violative of transfer policy; court held that transfers were in public interest and no mala fides established.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, 24 employees of MOIL Limited, a public sector undertaking, filed a writ petition challenging their transfer orders issued by the mana...
- 112
