Search Results for "salary difference"

599 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 599 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Commissioner of Labour's Order Holding Religious Trust as Commercial Establishment Under Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948. Trust's Charitable and Religious Objects Exclude It from Definition of Commercial Establishment Under Section 2(4) of the Act.

The petitioner, Shri Vatavriksha Swami Maharaj Devasthan, Akkalkot, is a religious and charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court Award in Industrial Dispute — Termination Upheld as Workman Failed to Prove 240 Days of Continuous Service. Labour Court's Finding of Fact Not Perverse, No Interference Under Article 226 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Keru Kisan Rokade, was initially appointed on a temporary basis by the respondent, Geoffery Manners & Co. Ltd., Nasik. Although his ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Inter-State Prisoners Challenging Local Surety Condition for Furlough. Condition in Government Circular dated 16th December 2008 requiring local surety within Maharashtra for prisoners from other States held violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The Bombay High Court dealt with two criminal writ petitions filed by prisoners Subodh Prasad and Jagbir Singh challenging the condition in Government...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Provident Fund Nomination Dispute — Nominee Entitled to Receive Amount as Trustee for Heirs. Joint Nomination Creates Co-Trusteeship Under Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952.

The appellant, Antonio Joao Fernandes, filed a suit claiming 50% of the provident fund amount of his deceased cousin Joazinho Dias, who had nominated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Reason to Believe — Amount Received on Retirement from Partnership Firm Held to be Capital Receipt Not Chargeable to Tax.

The petitioners, Prashant S. Joshi and Dattaram Shridhar Bhosale, were partners in a real estate development partnership firm. They retired from the p...