Search Results for "Continuous Occupation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Continuous Occupation"

614 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 614 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Chairman of APMC Katol for Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. Notice Issued on 02.12.2013 for Meeting on 12.12.2013 Held Invalid as It Did Not Provide 15 Clear Days' Notice as Required by Rule 14(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Rules, 1967.

12 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Dinesh Sheshrao Thakre, Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), Katol, challenged a notice dated 02.12.2013 issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Non-Compliance with Section 59 of Bombay Police Act, 1951 — Failure to Record Subjective Satisfaction and Provide In-camera Statements. The court held that the Externing Authority must independently apply its mind and record subjective satisfaction, and that in-camera statements must be recorded and supplied to the externee.

2 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Manik Ramchandra Gupta, challenged an externment order passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Thane, under Section 59 of the Bombay ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Rescind Consent Decree and Allows Substitution of Legal Heirs in Recovery Suit. Consent Terms Are Binding Contract; Legal Representatives Can Be Substituted Under Order 22 CPC for Execution of Decree.

29 Oct 2013

The plaintiffs filed a suit (Suit No.2011 of 2002) against the defendants for recovery of Rs.3,30,00,000 with interest. On 3rd October 2006, the parti...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Arbitrator's Award of Interest on Escalation Amount Upheld as Not Contrary to Contract Terms.

6 Feb 2013

The case involves an appeal by Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation against a judgment of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Parbhani...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlords' Petition in Rent Control Case — Tenant's Subletting and Non-Payment of Rent Established. The Court held that the tenant's failure to pay rent and unauthorized subletting justified eviction under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

5 Dec 2006

The petitioners, landlords of a premises in Pune, filed a writ petition challenging the appellate judgment that reversed the trial court's eviction or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Appellate Authority's Order Limiting Assessment Period for Unauthorised Use of Electricity to Three Months Under Section 127 of Electricity Act, 2003. The court held that the appellate authority exceeded its jurisdiction by imposing a limitation not provided for in the Act.

27 Jul 2006

The petitioners, Reliance Energy Limited and its shareholder, challenged the order dated 18.3.2005 passed by the Chief Engineer (Electrical), PWD Depa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance and Easement Case — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Right of Way. Court holds that permissive user does not create easement of necessity or prescriptive easement under Indian Easements Act, 1882.

31 Mar 2006

The appellant, Smt. Shalini Laxman Wadnerkar, as the sole surviving legal representative of the original plaintiff G.G. Suvarnapathak, appealed agains...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Decree for Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Suit for Recovery of Possession Based on Prior Possession Maintainable Without Proof of Title. The Court held that a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is maintainable for recovery of possession based on prior possession alone, and the defendant cannot raise the question of title.

19 Nov 2005

The case involves a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging a judgment of the City Civil Court ...

High Court

LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO. 449 OF 2004

23 Sep 2005

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Wife's Appeal, Upholds Divorce and Denies Maintenance in Hindu Marriage Act Case. Wife's persistent demand for separate residence and false allegations of impotency constituted cruelty and desertion, disentitling her to maintenance.

4 Feb 2005

The appellant wife, Mrs. Meena Dinesh Parmar, filed an appeal against the judgment and order of the Family Court, Pune, dated 26.2.2001, which granted...

51 52 53 54 55

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)