Search Results for "unregistered document"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "unregistered document"

543 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 543 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Allowing Amendment of Plaint in Partition Suit — Amendment Sought After 13 Years, Causing Prejudice to Defendants. The court held that belated amendments altering the nature of the suit and causing irreparable prejudice to the opposite party cannot be allowed under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC.

25 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Smt. Hamsaveni, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 21.04.2021 passed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Impleadment in Specific Performance Suit — Petitioners Not Necessary or Proper Parties Under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC. Leasehold Rights Acquired Pending Suit Are Subject to Lis Pendens and Do Not Entitle Impleadment.

18 Jul 2019

The petitioners, Sandeep Ramesh Solanki and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Suits in Trademark Dispute from Kopargaon to Nagpur for Convenience of Parties and Witnesses. The court held that the balance of convenience favors transfer under Section 24 CPC where all parties and witnesses are based in Nagpur and the subject matter is connected to Nagpur.

7 May 2013

The judgment concerns two Misc. Civil Applications filed by Nagpur Distillers Pvt. Ltd. and Vidarbha Distillers seeking transfer of three suits (Suit ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Compromise Decree Dispute — Regular Civil Appeal Not Maintainable Against Consent Decree Under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC. The Court held that a consent decree cannot be challenged by a regular appeal and the lower appellate court's remand order was without jurisdiction.

17 Oct 2012

The appellant, Ramesh Balaji Ekhande, original plaintiff no.5, challenged the judgment dated 17.3.2008 passed by the District Judge-3, Nasik in Civil ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Temporary Injunction in Property Dispute — Plaintiff Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case for Possessory Protection Under Specific Relief Act, 1963. The court held that unregistered agreements do not confer possessory title and balance of convenience favored defendants.

18 Nov 2011

The appellant, M/s. Buildtech Engineers, filed an appeal against the order of the City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai, which rejected its Notice of Motio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Assault and Robbery Case Due to Compromise Between Parties. Criminal proceedings under Sections 392, 323, 504 IPC quashed as parties settled dispute amicably, avoiding abuse of process of court.

27 Jul 2011

The applicants (original accused) filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No. I37/2011 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Chamber Summons to Raise Attachment Under Order 21 Rule 54 CPC — Bona Fide Purchaser for Value Without Notice of Decree Protected. The court held that an attachment order served after the purchaser had paid full consideration and obtained possession is not binding on the purchaser.

6 Apr 2005

The present chamber summons was taken out by the applicant, Rajneesh Agarwal & Associates P. Ltd, seeking to raise an attachment under Order 21 Rule 5...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Appeals and Interim Applications in Developer-Dispute Cases — Appointment of Sole Arbitrator Upheld Despite Alleged Non-Signatory Status. Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 empowers court to appoint arbitrator even if some parties are non-signatories to arbitration agreement, provided they are claiming through or under signatory parties.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two arbitration appeals and two interim applications arising from a dispute between purchasers (appellants) and a developer (respond...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Landowners Challenging Appointment of Arbitrator in Development Dispute. Disputes under Development Agreements Held Arbitrable Due to Existence of Arbitration Clause Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two arbitration appeals (Arbitration Appeal No. 102 of 2024 and Arbitration Appeal No. 101 of 2024) along with interim applic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Appeals and Interim Applications in Developer Dispute — Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Alleged Non-Signatory Status. Court holds that non-signatory to an arbitration agreement can be referred to arbitration under the 'group of companies' doctrine and Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment arises from two arbitration appeals and two interim applications filed before the Bombay High Court. The appellants, Arvind Ratanchand Ja...

50 51 52 53 54

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)