Search Results for "Vendor Not Party"

748 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 748 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Title Dispute Involving Multiple Previous Suits. Court Examines Maintainability Under Order 2 Rule 2 CPC and Relief Requirements Under Section 34 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 Regarding Declaration Without Consequential Possession.

The dispute originated from a property suit O.S.No.156/2010 filed by seven plaintiffs seeking declaration of title and permanent injunction regarding ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Bank's Wilful Defaulter Declaration for Violating Natural Justice. Show-cause notice lacking specific grounds renders the decision invalid under RBI Master Circular on Wilful Defaulters.

The petitioners, Nitin Shah, Rahul Shah, and Kunal Shah, who were directors of Nitin Fire Protection Industries Ltd. (the corporate debtor under CIRP)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Considers Appeals Against Quashing of SC/ST Liquor License Reservation Notification. Single Judge Quashed Notification as Discriminatory, State Appeals.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, by this common order, addressed a batch of writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application in Eviction Case — Subletting and Acquisition of Alternate Accommodation Established. Decree confirmed under Section 13(1)(e) and 13(1)(l) of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The applicants, claiming to be tenants of the respondents, were involved in two suits: one filed by the applicants for declaration and injunction (R.A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Part in Flat Purchase Dispute — Earnest Money Refund with Daily Fine and Compound Interest Upheld but Reduced. Clause 4 of Agreement for Construction and Sale Held to Be a Valid Forfeiture Clause, Not a Penalty, Under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The plaintiff, Dr. Jagdish J.N. Counte, entered into a written agreement dated 13.4.96 with the defendant, M/s. Carl Estate Private Limited, for the p...