Search Results for "cadre and recruitment rules"

644 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 644 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Notification for President Posts in District Consumer Forums Due to Lack of Consultation with High Court. Appointment Process Under Section 10 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Requires Prior Consultation with High Court Chief Justice.

The petitioners, three advocates, challenged a notification dated 23.04.2012 issued by the Under Secretary, Department of Food & Civil Supplies and Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Judicial Officer's Appeal in Seniority Dispute Under West Bengal Judicial Service Rules. High Court's Administrative Decision to Rectify Promotion Delay by Fixing Seniority Against 2004-2008 Vacancies Upheld as Valid, Setting Aside High Court Orders.

The dispute concerned a judicial officer's seniority fixation in the West Bengal Higher Judicial Service. The appellant joined the Judicial Service in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows ICAR Appeal in Service Benefit Dispute — Scientists and Technical Staff Not Similarly Situated for Advance Increments on Acquiring Ph.D. Article 14 Does Not Mandate Equal Treatment Across Distinct Cadres Governed by Different Rules.

The case involves a dispute between the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and its technical staff (respondents) regarding entitlement to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Candidate Denied District Judge Post Due to Pending Criminal Case. Acquittal After Selection Process Does Not Entitle Automatic Appointment; Employer Has Right to Assess Suitability Based on Character and Conduct.

The appellant, Anil Bhardwaj, applied for the post of District Judge (Entry Level) in the Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Service pursuant to an advert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Award for Lack of Notification Under Section 13 of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. Acquisition Proceedings for Resettlement of Project-Affected Persons Found Void Due to Non-Declaration of Affected and Benefitted Zones.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by eleven agriculturists whose lands in Bhendegaon Khurd village we...