Search Results for "Regulatory Compliance"

667 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 667 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Medical Education for Persons with Disabilities — Ensures Equal Opportunity and Reasonable Accommodation

The Supreme Court set aside the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s order and directed admission of a PwD candidate to the MBBS course, emphasizing the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against KPSC's Refusal to Expand Rank Lists for Junior Health Inspector Post. Autonomy of Kerala Public Service Commission Under Article 320 of the Constitution Upheld, No Authority Can Direct Expansion of Rank Lists.

The present appeals arose from a judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala dated 14.02.2024, which upheld the decision of the Kerala ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Borrower's Waiver Challenge and ARCL's Interest Inclusion Petitions in SARFAESI Appeal Pre-Deposit Dispute. The Court reduced pre-deposit from 50% to 25% of debt due including interest, balancing the borrower's right to appeal and the secured creditor's interests.

The case involves cross-petitions arising from a common DRAT order dated 04 June 2024. The borrower, M/s Royal Traders, challenged the DRAT's refusal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Vehicle Theft Insurance Claim — Negligence Not a Valid Ground for Repudiation. Theft of vehicle due to driver leaving keys in ignition does not amount to breach of policy conditions; insurer directed to pay 75% of sum assured on non-standard basis.

The appellant, Ashok Kumar, was the owner of a truck (dumper) bearing registration No. HR-55C-5385, insured with New India Assurance Co. Ltd. for an I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit and Recruitment Interval Rules for Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. Rules 8(1) and 12 of UPHJS Rules, 1975 Held Valid as Not Manifestly Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 16.

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The petitioner...