Search Results for "Vendor Not Party"

718 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 718 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Title Dispute Involving Multiple Previous Suits. Court Examines Maintainability Under Order 2 Rule 2 CPC and Relief Requirements Under Section 34 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 Regarding Declaration Without Consequential Possession.

The dispute originated from a property suit O.S.No.156/2010 filed by seven plaintiffs seeking declaration of title and permanent injunction regarding ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Forgery in Land Dispute Case. Appellant convicted under Sections 302, 201, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC for murdering landowner and forging power of attorney to transfer property.

The appellant, Tanaji Maruti Kolekar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for the murder of Kasturabai Tonape and for offences of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from a suit for declaration of ownership and injunct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Suit Barred by Limitation. Suit for declaration of title and partition filed after 12 years from date of knowledge of adverse possession held time-barred under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The present Second Appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 7th October 1991 of the Additional District Judge, Pune, in Civil Appeal No.265 of 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act for Cheque Dishonour Due to Stop Payment. Accused's Defence of Agreement Breach Fails as Stop Payment Constitutes Dishonour Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Gabriel Peter D'Souza, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negoti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Part in Flat Purchase Dispute — Earnest Money Refund with Daily Fine and Compound Interest Upheld but Reduced. Clause 4 of Agreement for Construction and Sale Held to Be a Valid Forfeiture Clause, Not a Penalty, Under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The plaintiff, Dr. Jagdish J.N. Counte, entered into a written agreement dated 13.4.96 with the defendant, M/s. Carl Estate Private Limited, for the p...