High Court of Bombay at Goa Delivers Judgment in Writ Petition No. 403 of 2022 and P.I.L. Writ Petition No. 32 of 2022. The Court adjudicated connected matters involving multiple respondents and state/government authorities.
8 May 2025...
Search Results for "Unauthorised construction"
549 result(s) found
Found 549 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Concurrent Findings of Bonafide Requirement in Eviction Suit. Landlord's need for suit premises for dairy business upheld despite minor inconsistencies in evidence.
20 Dec 2024The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendants (tenants) challenging the concurrent findings of the Small Causes Cour...
- 426
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Concurrent Findings in Tenancy Declaration Suit. Applicant fails to prove membership of deceased tenant's family or residence in suit premises under Section 7(15)(d) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
11 Dec 2024The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Pradeep Kumar Lalit Kumar Pandya challenging the concurrent judgments of the Small Causes Cour...
- 508
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where courts below have concurrently found that the plaintiff failed to prove title and possession.
22 Jun 2024The present second appeal was filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal representatives) against the judgment and decree d...
- 103
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Protection of Heritage Monument in Mining Dispute - Imposes Compensation and Environmental Safeguards. The court affirmed the High Court's directions cancelling mining leases within 10 km of Chittorgarh Fort and ordering Rs. 5 crores compensation under the polluter-pays principle, based on expert reports assessing damage from blasting under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.
12 Jan 2024The dispute centered on the impact of mining blasting operations on the Chittorgarh Fort, a notified monument under the Ancient and Historical Monumen...
- 258
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Borrowers' Right to Hearing in RBI Fraud Classification Directions. The Court held that principles of natural justice, specifically audi alteram partem, must be read into the Reserve Bank of India (Frauds Classification and Reporting by Commercial Banks and Select FIs) Directions 2016 to prevent arbitrariness, as classification entails serious civil consequences under Clauses 8.9.4 and 8.9.5.
27 Mar 2023The civil appeals arose from challenges to the Reserve Bank of India (Frauds Classification and Reporting by Commercial Banks and Select FIs) Directio...
- 301
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Distribution Companies in Electricity Regulatory Dispute - Upholds APTEL's Direction for Merits-Based Disposal of Tariff Determination and Power Purchase Agreement Approval Petitions. Appellate Tribunal for Electricity Correctly Ordered State Commission to Decide Petitions on Merits After State Commission Allowed Withdrawal of One Petition and Dismissed the Other, Ensuring Statutory Functions Under Electricity Act, 2003 Are Fulfilled.
2 Feb 2022The appeal arose from a dispute between Distribution Companies (DISCOMS) and Hinduja National Power Corporation Limited (HNPCL) regarding power purcha...
- 299
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Purchaser in Pending Eviction Suit — Lis Pendens Does Not Bar Impleadment Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Purchaser of suit property during pendency of litigation is entitled to be impleaded to protect her interest, as the principle of lis pendens under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 only binds the purchaser by the decree, not prohibits impleadment.
19 Sep 2017The petitioner, Minalini Lalit Modi, purchased the suit flat from the tenant (respondent no.2) during the pendency of an eviction suit filed by the la...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Over Encroachment and Rainwater Drainage. Court finds that the first appellate court failed to consider the map attached to the sale deed and the trial court's findings on encroachment, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
21 Aug 2015The appellant, Meenadevi Vatnani, filed a Second Appeal against the judgment of the Principal District Judge, Amravati, dated 5.3.2014, which reversed...
- 52
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Obligation of State Government to Consider Detenu's Representation Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention Cases. Question of Whether Article 22(5) Mandates Separate Consideration by Government Before Referral to Advisory Board Under Preventive Detention Act, 1950.
31 Jan 1969The case involved writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution filed by Abdul Karim and Others against the State of West Bengal challenging the...
