Search Results for "Arbitration petition"

2678 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2678 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge to MSME Facilitation Council Awards Against National Textile Corporation. Awards Upheld as Facilitation Council Had Jurisdiction Under MSMED Act and Awards Not Patently Illegal.

The petitioner, National Textile Corporation Ltd., filed two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Council Award for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Arbitration Procedure Under MSMED Act. Council's Order Without Proper Conciliation and Arbitration Proceedings Held Invalid.

The appellant, Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, successor of Jharkhand State Electricity Board, entered into a contract with respondent No.3, M/s. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Application for Correction of Clerical Error Does Not Extend Limitation Period for Challenging Award.

The petitioners, Dr. Writer's Food Products Pvt. Ltd. and two individuals, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Appeal Against Partial Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Non-Signatory Principal Held Liable Based on Agency Relationship and Implied Consent.

The appeals arose from three arbitral awards passed in disputes relating to the construction of mustard seed processing and storage silos in Rajasthan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Arbitral Award and District Court Order in Partnership Dispute. Court holds that findings of fact by arbitrator are not open to reappreciation under Section 34 unless perverse or contrary to public policy.

The appellants, M. Mallikarjuna and Smt. Rajeshwari Mallikarjuna, filed an appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute — Restores Arbitral Award for Compensation for Unproductive Use of Machinery. Court Holds That High Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting Its Own View.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s. Dyna Technologies Pvt. Ltd. against the judgment of the Madras High Court, which had set aside an a...