Search Results for "vicarious liability"

480 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 480 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution of Directors for Delayed TDS Deposit Under Section 276B Income Tax Act — Delay Not Equivalent to Failure to Pay. Vicarious Liability Requires Specific Averments of Being In-Charge and Responsible; No Notice Under Section 2(35) or Order Under Section 201(1) Passed.

The petitioners, directors of M/s. Hubtown Ltd., challenged the issuance of process against them under Section 276B r/w 278B of the Income Tax Act, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Managing Director in Legal Metrology Case for Lack of Specific Allegations. Failure to Disclose Role in Offence Under Section 36(1) of Legal Metrology Act, 2009 Renders Process Invalid.

The applicant, Mr. Gautam Hari Singhania, the Chairman and Managing Director of Raymond Limited, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application Challenging Amendment in Cheque Dishonour Case. Amendment to Add Vicarious Liability Pleadings Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Held Permissible as It Does Not Change Nature of Complaint or Cause Prejudice.

The case arises from a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 by the original complainant Syed Mazaruddin (since de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Complaint Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations of Role in Company Affairs. Directors Not Vicariously Liable Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Averment of Their Responsibility at Time of Cheque Issuance.

The applicants, Mukund Ajay Kumar Choudhary, Kapil Ajay Kumar Choudhary, and Ajay Kumar Choudhary, were directors of CLC Industries Ltd., the accused ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Complainant's Appeals in Criminal Summoning Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Sessions Court and High Court Correctly Quashed Summons Against Company Executives as Prima Facie Case Not Made Out Under Sections 427, 447, 506, and 120B read with Section 34 IPC.

The dispute arose from a private complaint filed by the original complainant against thirteen accused, including companies and their executives, for o...