Search Results for "vendor purchaser contract"

305 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 305 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Declaration of Title Over BDA Acquired Land — Petitioner Fails to Establish Possession or Title After 1971 Acquisition Notification Under City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945.

The petitioner, Sri Venu, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the respondents hav...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Orders Refund of Earnest Money with Interest. Plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness, but defendants cannot forfeit earnest money without proof of loss.

The original plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 20.02.2008 in respect of a suit property admeasuring 70,000...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Trial Court Decree for Execution of Sale Deed. Agreement of Sale Dated 02.08.2007 Proved by Plaintiff; Defendants Failed to Discharge Burden of Proof Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellants (defendants) challenged the judgment and decree dated 20.10.2012 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Channarayapatna, in O.S. No. 4/2008,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Refund of Forfeited Auction Amount in SARFAESI Sale Due to Bank's Failure to Issue Sale Certificate. Bank's Failure to Perform Reciprocal Promise Discharges Bidder from Obligation to Pay Balance.

The petitioner, Sri Kalyanamurthy K., participated in an e-auction conducted by the State Bank of India (respondent) for the sale of an immovable prop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restoring Arbitral Award That Declared Termination of Master Asset Purchase Agreement by Repudiation. Court Holds That Single Judge Exceeded Scope of Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting His Own View.

The appeal arises from a dispute between V Hotels Ltd (appellant) and Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt Ltd (respondent no. 1) concerning a Master Asset Purc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Restores Trial Court Decree for Possession and Damages. Defendant's Possession Not Protected Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Due to Breach of Contract and Non-Performance.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiff, Deorao Balaji Bhoyar (since deceased, through legal representatives), against the j...