Search Results for "unconditional admission"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "unconditional admission"

194 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 194 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Injunction Restraining Bank from Enforcing Corporate Guarantee. The court set aside the injunction as the guarantee deed was unconditional and the bank had a prima facie case under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, enabling it to proceed under SARFAESI Act and IBC.

17 Feb 2026

The appeal arose from an order dated 25.07.2024 passed by the LXXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (Commercial Court) in I.A. No....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal to Enforce English Summary Judgment in Guarantee Dispute — Foreign Judgment Held Unenforceable for Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 13 CPC. Summary judgment passed after denying leave to defend is not conclusive and cannot be enforced in India.

1 Jan 2026

The dispute arose from a Share Purchase and Co-operation Agreement (SPCA) executed on 12.05.1995 between (appellant, a foreign company) and (responden...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Condonation of 9-Year Delay in Recall Application in Suit Withdrawal Case — Unconditional Withdrawal Under Order XXIII Rule 1(1) CPC is Plaintiff's Absolute Right. The court held that the plaintiff's right to unconditionally withdraw a suit is absolute and cannot be fettered by the court, and a delay of over 9 years in seeking recall of such an order cannot be condoned without sufficient cause.

21 Feb 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Vaishnavi Engineers and Developers Private Limited, had filed a suit (RCS No. 782 of 2012) against the respondents seeking declar...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Money Loan Dispute — Sets Aside Appellate Court's Decree for Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. Failure to Frame Points for Determination and Lack of Proper Reappreciation of Evidence Renders First Appellate Court's Judgment Unsustainable.

12 Jul 2024

The appellant-defendant filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the judgment and decree dated 1...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Partition Suit — Order Rejecting Application for Judgment on Admissions Upheld. Court held that admissions must be clear and unequivocal for judgment under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC, and disputed questions of fact cannot be decided in such application.

4 Aug 2023

The petitioner, who is the first defendant in a suit for partition and separate possession, filed a revision petition under Section 115 CPC challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summary Suit for Recovery of Loan Due to Unenforceable Oral Agreement and Lack of Written Contract. Loan advanced for litigation funding held to be a contingent agreement not enforceable under Order 37 CPC as it lacked a written contract and was based on an oral understanding.

26 Feb 2020

The plaintiff, Vishal Kedia, filed a commercial summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendant, Sureshkumar S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Discharges Respondents in Suo Motu Criminal Contempt for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Court Orders. Court holds that mere breach of undertaking does not constitute criminal contempt unless it scandalizes or lowers authority of court.

28 Aug 2018

The High Court of Bombay initiated suo motu criminal contempt proceedings against respondent no.1 (M.N. Navale, President of Sinhgad Technical Educati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Earnest Money Under Oral Agreement. Oral Agreement for Sale Does Not Fall Within Order 37 CPC Categories, Hence Unconditional Leave to Defend Granted.

30 Jan 2018

The respondent-plaintiff filed Special Civil Suit No.120 of 2017 before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune, seeking recovery of Rs.12,00,000/- (inc...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Initiates Suo Motu Contempt Against Advocate for Disrupting Court Proceedings. Advocate's Rowdy Behavior and Improper Language in Court Amounts to Prima Facie Criminal Contempt Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

21 Dec 2010

The High Court of Bombay, on its own motion, initiated contempt proceedings against Mr. N.B. Deshmukh, an advocate, based on an incident that occurred...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition as Time-Barred Under Limitation Act — Acknowledgment Letters Do Not Extend Limitation Beyond Three Years. The court held that a winding-up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 must be filed within three years from the last acknowledgment of debt; otherwise, it is barred by limitation.

2 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Uma Kumar, proprietor of Kandhan Electricals & Engineers, filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act,...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)