Madras High Court Delivers Common Judgment in Land Record Disputes. The Court Considers the Validity of Orders Passed by Revenue Authorities Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
20 Mar 2025...
Search Results for "uncertainty land"
349 result(s) found
Found 349 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Temporary Injunction in Specific Performance Suit Based on Oral Agreement for Sale. Agreement to Sell Need Not Be in Writing If Followed by Part Performance Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
5 Oct 2005The present appeal arises from an order dated 6/11/2004 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur in Special Civil Suit No. 201/2004, g...
- 84
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Legality of Land Acquisition for Jaipur Metro Rail Phase II, Focusing on Compliance with Section 5A Hearing. The Court Examined Whether Denial of Personal Hearing to Landowners Vitiates Acquisition under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
1 Jan 1970The Supreme Court heard civil appeals by landowners challenging a Division Bench judgment of the Rajasthan High Court that reversed a Single Judge's o...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement Not Barred by Limitation and Not Void for Uncertainty. Court upholds concurrent findings that the agreement dated 11.12.1980 was valid and enforceable, and the suit filed in 1994 was within limitation as the cause of action was continuing.
28 Apr 2017The appellant, Maria Fatima @ Silo Silva Coelho, was the defendant in a suit for specific performance filed by the respondent, Vaman Narayan Kundaikar...
- 54
High Court
High Court of Bombay Quashes Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's Order of Remand in Agricultural Tenancy Cases as Being Unwarranted When No Evidence of Tenancy Existed. The Court Holds That Remand for Fresh Enquiry is Impermissible Under Principles Analogous to Order XLI Rules 23 and 23A of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, When the Revisional Authority Concludes That There Is No Material to Prove the Claim of Tenancy Under Section 70(b) of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.
1 Nov 2012The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dealt with 128 writ petitions filed by landowners challenging a common order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribuna...
- 10
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petition Challenging Irrigation Restoration Charges — Rate and Area of IRC Disputed; Petitioner Alleges Discrimination and Exorbitant Demand. Issue of whether IRC should be calculated at Rs. 50,000 per hectare as per report dated 11.01.2008 instead of Rs. 1 lakh per hectare under Government Resolution dated 06.03.2009.
5 May 2016The petitioner, a public limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in power generation, challenged the demand for Irrigatio...
- 16
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Rejects Recusal Plea in Land Acquisition Reference. Judge Who Decided Smaller Bench Can Sit in Larger Bench to Reconsider Same Issue as Bias Plea Based on Extrajudicial Factors.
23 Oct 2019This order arises from a reference to a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India concerning the interpretation of Section 24 of the...
- 248
High Court
GST on Advances for Future Supplies: Examining Constitutional Validity. Evaluating GST's application to unutilized advances and its constitutionality.
14 Nov 2024The L&T IHI Consortium, a collaboration between Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (L&T) and IHI Infrastructure Systems Co. Ltd., Japan, challenged the ...
- 341
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Against Decree for Specific Performance in Suit Involving Subsequent Purchasers. The trial court had decreed specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural lands, directing the original vendor and later purchasers to execute a joint sale deed.
11 Oct 2013The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural lands. The first defendant, the owner, agreed to sell the ...
- 31
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Joint Family Property Dispute — Tenancy Rights Determined Under Bombay Tenancy Act, Civil Court Jurisdiction Barred. The court held that the civil court lacked jurisdiction to decide tenancy issues under Sections 85 and 85A of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, but the certificate under Section 32M had become final.
27 Aug 2019The dispute pertains to an open land measuring eight acres in Nasik, originally owned by Raghunath Hari Phadake. The land was taken on lease by Govind...
- 249
