Search Results for "unavoidable circumstances"

305 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 305 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Bank's Wilful Defaulter Declaration for Violating Natural Justice. Show-cause notice lacking specific grounds renders the decision invalid under RBI Master Circular on Wilful Defaulters.

The petitioners, Nitin Shah, Rahul Shah, and Kunal Shah, who were directors of Nitin Fire Protection Industries Ltd. (the corporate debtor under CIRP)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Registration of Document Despite Pending Stamp Duty Adjudication — Period of Adjudication Excluded for Limitation Under Section 23 of Registration Act. Sub-Registrar Cannot Refuse Registration on Ground of Pending Adjudication Under Section 31 of Maharashtra Stamp Act.

The petitioner, Snehanjali Electronics and Trading Private Limited, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub-Registrar, Andheri I (Respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Reconveyance of Land Transferred for Electricity Sub-Station. Petitioner's claim of coercion and duress after ten years rejected as the transfer was a voluntary commercial transaction under a registered Deed of Transfer.

The petitioner, Goan Real Estate and Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Second Appeal in Land Dispute Case Due to Non-Compliance with Conditional Order. Court holds that failure to pay costs as directed by the court results in dismissal of the appeal under Section 100 CPC.

The State of Karnataka and its officers filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Delay of 13 Days in Deciding Detenu's Representation Violates Constitutional Safeguard Under Article 22(5) and Section 8(1) of MPDA Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Vinod Dhannulal Jaiswal, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the District Magistrate, Aurangabad (respondent No.1) u...